Justine M Russell1, Rebecca L Nick-Dart2, Brandon D Nornhold2. 1. Justine M. Russell, Pharm. D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Emergency Department; Rebecca L. Nick-Dart, Pharm. D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Internal Medicine; and Brandon D. Nornhold, Pharm. D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Critical Care, Saint Vincent Hospital, Erie, PA. jrussell@svhs.org. 2. Justine M. Russell, Pharm. D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Emergency Department; Rebecca L. Nick-Dart, Pharm. D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Internal Medicine; and Brandon D. Nornhold, Pharm. D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Critical Care, Saint Vincent Hospital, Erie, PA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A hospital protocol utilizing automatic dosage adjustments and pharmacist consultations to optimize the use of certain medications in obese patients is described. SUMMARY: After conducting a literature search focused on medication dosing in obese patients, pharmacists at a large community hospital developed a list of commonly ordered medications appropriate for inclusion in a pharmacy-driven institutional protocol for automatic medication dosage adjustment in adult patients with obesity. Evidence-based recommendations on initial dosing of eight antimicrobials and two anticoagulant agents according to weight and renal function were formulated. Under the protocol, pharmacists receive electronic alerts regarding protocol-eligible patients during initial order verification and automatically adjust medication dosages as appropriate. For patients prescribed anticoagulants at specified dosage levels, clinical pharmacists consult with prescribers to help ensure safe and effective initial and ongoing therapy. Multidisciplinary educational initiatives were conducted prior to protocol implementation. During two designated three-week postimplementation data collection periods, pharmacists received a total of 372 protocol-eligible medication orders. Pharmacists adjusted a total of 149 dosages and verified an additional 183 dosages consistent with the protocol as originally ordered. Clinical pharmacy consults were completed for 10-15% of patients, with laboratory monitoring ordered in 25-30% of those cases (all patients were found to have appropriate test values). There have been no documented adverse drug reactions in patients whose medication dosages were adjusted per protocol. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists implemented weight- and renal function-based dosage adjustments for obese patients in 40% of evaluated protocol-eligible cases to achieve 89% compliance with the protocol. Heparin and cefazolin were the medications most likely to require obesity-related dosage adjustments.
PURPOSE: A hospital protocol utilizing automatic dosage adjustments and pharmacist consultations to optimize the use of certain medications in obesepatients is described. SUMMARY: After conducting a literature search focused on medication dosing in obesepatients, pharmacists at a large community hospital developed a list of commonly ordered medications appropriate for inclusion in a pharmacy-driven institutional protocol for automatic medication dosage adjustment in adult patients with obesity. Evidence-based recommendations on initial dosing of eight antimicrobials and two anticoagulant agents according to weight and renal function were formulated. Under the protocol, pharmacists receive electronic alerts regarding protocol-eligible patients during initial order verification and automatically adjust medication dosages as appropriate. For patients prescribed anticoagulants at specified dosage levels, clinical pharmacists consult with prescribers to help ensure safe and effective initial and ongoing therapy. Multidisciplinary educational initiatives were conducted prior to protocol implementation. During two designated three-week postimplementation data collection periods, pharmacists received a total of 372 protocol-eligible medication orders. Pharmacists adjusted a total of 149 dosages and verified an additional 183 dosages consistent with the protocol as originally ordered. Clinical pharmacy consults were completed for 10-15% of patients, with laboratory monitoring ordered in 25-30% of those cases (all patients were found to have appropriate test values). There have been no documented adverse drug reactions in patients whose medication dosages were adjusted per protocol. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists implemented weight- and renal function-based dosage adjustments for obesepatients in 40% of evaluated protocol-eligible cases to achieve 89% compliance with the protocol. Heparin and cefazolin were the medications most likely to require obesity-related dosage adjustments.