Stephen A Vosti1, Justin Kagin2, Reina Engle-Stone3, Kennth H Brown4. 1. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA vosti@primal.ucdavis.edu. 2. Kagin's Consulting, Vacaville, CA, USA. 3. Department of Nutrition, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA. 4. Department of Nutrition, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin A (VA) intervention programs in developing countries do not generally consider spatial differences in needs or in intervention costs. New data from Cameroon reveal nonuniform spatial distributions of VA deficiency among young children and of costs of some of the programs designed to address them. METHODS: We develop a spatially explicit, intertemporal economic optimization tool that makes use of subnational dietary intake data and VA intervention program costs to identify more efficient sets of interventions to improve VA nutrition among young children aged 6 to 59 months in Cameroon. RESULTS: The model suggests substantial changes in the composition and geographic foci of VA intervention programs vis-à-vis a business-as-usual scenario. National VA-fortified edible oil and bouillon cube programs are cost-effective, even when start-up costs are considered. High-dosage VA supplementation delivered via Child Health Days is most cost-effective in the North macro-region, where needs are greatest and the cost per child effectively covered is lowest. Overall, the VA intervention programs suggested by the optimization model are approximately 44% less expensive, with no change in the total number of children effectively covered nationwide. CONCLUSIONS: The VA intervention programs should consider spatial and temporal differences in needs and in the expected benefits and costs of alternative VA interventions. Doing so will require spatially disaggregated strategies and the data and political will to support them, longer planning time horizons than are currently used in most developing countries, and long-term funding commitments.
BACKGROUND:Vitamin A (VA) intervention programs in developing countries do not generally consider spatial differences in needs or in intervention costs. New data from Cameroon reveal nonuniform spatial distributions of VA deficiency among young children and of costs of some of the programs designed to address them. METHODS: We develop a spatially explicit, intertemporal economic optimization tool that makes use of subnational dietary intake data and VA intervention program costs to identify more efficient sets of interventions to improve VA nutrition among young children aged 6 to 59 months in Cameroon. RESULTS: The model suggests substantial changes in the composition and geographic foci of VA intervention programs vis-à-vis a business-as-usual scenario. National VA-fortified edible oil and bouillon cube programs are cost-effective, even when start-up costs are considered. High-dosage VA supplementation delivered via Child Health Days is most cost-effective in the North macro-region, where needs are greatest and the cost per child effectively covered is lowest. Overall, the VA intervention programs suggested by the optimization model are approximately 44% less expensive, with no change in the total number of children effectively covered nationwide. CONCLUSIONS: The VA intervention programs should consider spatial and temporal differences in needs and in the expected benefits and costs of alternative VA interventions. Doing so will require spatially disaggregated strategies and the data and political will to support them, longer planning time horizons than are currently used in most developing countries, and long-term funding commitments.
Authors: Katherine P Adams; Hanqi Luo; Stephen A Vosti; Justin Kagin; Ismael Ngnie-Teta; Alex Ndjebayi; Jules Guintang Assiene; Reina Engle-Stone Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 6.499
Authors: Emily C Keats; Lynnette M Neufeld; Greg S Garrett; Mduduzi N N Mbuya; Zulfiqar A Bhutta Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Reina Engle-Stone; Stephen A Vosti; Hanqi Luo; Justin Kagin; Ann Tarini; Katherine P Adams; Caitlin French; Kenneth H Brown Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Maaike J Bruins; Roland Kupka; Michael B Zimmermann; Georg Lietz; Reina Engle-Stone; Klaus Kraemer Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Ruth Pearson; Madhura Killedar; Janka Petravic; Jakub J Kakietek; Nick Scott; Kelsey L Grantham; Robyn M Stuart; David J Kedziora; Cliff C Kerr; Jolene Skordis-Worrall; Meera Shekar; David P Wilson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Stephen A Vosti; Justin Kagin; Reina Engle-Stone; Hanqi Luo; Ann Tarini; Adrienne Clermont; Jules Guintang Assiene; Martin Nankap; Kenneth H Brown Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Kevin Tang; Katherine P Adams; Elaine L Ferguson; Monica Woldt; Alexander A Kalimbira; Blessings Likoswe; Jennifer Yourkavitch; Benjamin Chrisinger; Sarah Pedersen; Lucia Segovia De La Revilla; Omar Dary; E Louise Ander; Edward J M Joy Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 6.499