OBJECTIVES: Breath composition may be suggestive of different conditions. E-nose technology has been used to profile volatile organic compounds (VOCs) pattern in the breath of patients compared with that of healthy individuals. BIOsensor-based multisensorial system for mimicking NOse, Tongue and Eyes (BIONOTE) technology differs from Cyranose® based on a set of separate transduction features. On the basis of our previously published experience, we investigated the discriminating ability of BIONOTE in a high-risk population enrolled in a lung cancer screening programme. METHODS: One hundred individuals were selected for BIONOTE based on the attribution to the high-risk category (i.e. age, smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status) of the University Campus Bio-Medico lung screening programme. We used a measure chain consisting of (i) a device named Pneumopipe (EU patent: EP2641537 (A1):2013-09-25) able to catch exhaled breath by an individual normally breathing into it and collect the exhalate onto an adsorbing cartridge; (ii) an apparatus for thermal desorption of the cartridge into the sensors chamber and (iii) a gas sensor array which is part of a sensorial platform named BIONOTE for the VOCs mixture analysis. Partial least square (PLS) has been used to build up the model, with Leave-One-Out cross-validation criterion. Each breath fingerprint analysis costs €10. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity were 86 and 95%, respectively, delineating a substantial difference between patients and healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data show that BIONOTE technology may be used to reduce false-positive rates resulting from lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in a cost-effective fashion. The model will be tested on a larger number of patients to confirm the reliability of these results.
OBJECTIVES: Breath composition may be suggestive of different conditions. E-nose technology has been used to profile volatile organic compounds (VOCs) pattern in the breath of patients compared with that of healthy individuals. BIOsensor-based multisensorial system for mimicking NOse, Tongue and Eyes (BIONOTE) technology differs from Cyranose® based on a set of separate transduction features. On the basis of our previously published experience, we investigated the discriminating ability of BIONOTE in a high-risk population enrolled in a lung cancer screening programme. METHODS: One hundred individuals were selected for BIONOTE based on the attribution to the high-risk category (i.e. age, smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status) of the University Campus Bio-Medico lung screening programme. We used a measure chain consisting of (i) a device named Pneumopipe (EU patent: EP2641537 (A1):2013-09-25) able to catch exhaled breath by an individual normally breathing into it and collect the exhalate onto an adsorbing cartridge; (ii) an apparatus for thermal desorption of the cartridge into the sensors chamber and (iii) a gas sensor array which is part of a sensorial platform named BIONOTE for the VOCs mixture analysis. Partial least square (PLS) has been used to build up the model, with Leave-One-Out cross-validation criterion. Each breath fingerprint analysis costs €10. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity were 86 and 95%, respectively, delineating a substantial difference between patients and healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data show that BIONOTE technology may be used to reduce false-positive rates resulting from lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in a cost-effective fashion. The model will be tested on a larger number of patients to confirm the reliability of these results.
Authors: Max H M C Scheepers; Zaid Al-Difaie; Lloyd Brandts; Andrea Peeters; Bart van Grinsven; Nicole D Bouvy Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Antonio De Vincentis; Marco Santonico; Federica Del Chierico; Annamaria Altomare; Benedetta Marigliano; Alice Laudisio; Sofia Reddel; Simone Grasso; Alessandro Zompanti; Giorgio Pennazza; Lorenza Putignani; Michele Pier Luca Guarino; Michele Cicala; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-07-19
Authors: I G van der Sar; N Wijbenga; M E Hellemons; C C Moor; G Nakshbandi; J G J V Aerts; O C Manintveld; M S Wijsenbeek Journal: Respir Res Date: 2021-09-17