Literature DB >> 26385966

Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life.

Cody E Hinchliff1, Stephen A Smith2, James F Allman3, J Gordon Burleigh4, Ruchi Chaudhary4, Lyndon M Coghill5, Keith A Crandall6, Jiabin Deng4, Bryan T Drew7, Romina Gazis8, Karl Gude9, David S Hibbett8, Laura A Katz10, H Dail Laughinghouse10, Emily Jane McTavish11, Peter E Midford5, Christopher L Owen4, Richard H Ree5, Jonathan A Rees12, Douglas E Soltis13, Tiffani Williams14, Karen A Cranston15.   

Abstract

Reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships that unite all lineages (the tree of life) is a grand challenge. The paucity of homologous character data across disparately related lineages currently renders direct phylogenetic inference untenable. To reconstruct a comprehensive tree of life, we therefore synthesized published phylogenies, together with taxonomic classifications for taxa never incorporated into a phylogeny. We present a draft tree containing 2.3 million tips-the Open Tree of Life. Realization of this tree required the assembly of two additional community resources: (i) a comprehensive global reference taxonomy and (ii) a database of published phylogenetic trees mapped to this taxonomy. Our open source framework facilitates community comment and contribution, enabling the tree to be continuously updated when new phylogenetic and taxonomic data become digitally available. Although data coverage and phylogenetic conflict across the Open Tree of Life illuminate gaps in both the underlying data available for phylogenetic reconstruction and the publication of trees as digital objects, the tree provides a compelling starting point for community contribution. This comprehensive tree will fuel fundamental research on the nature of biological diversity, ultimately providing up-to-date phylogenies for downstream applications in comparative biology, ecology, conservation biology, climate change, agriculture, and genomics.

Keywords:  biodiversity; phylogeny; synthesis; taxonomy; tree of life

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26385966      PMCID: PMC4611642          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423041112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

Review 1.  Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree.

Authors:  W F Doolittle
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Measuring support and finding unsupported relationships in supertrees.

Authors:  Mark Wilkinson; Davide Pisani; James A Cotton; Ian Corfe
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life.

Authors:  Casey W Dunn; Andreas Hejnol; David Q Matus; Kevin Pang; William E Browne; Stephen A Smith; Elaine Seaver; Greg W Rouse; Matthias Obst; Gregory D Edgecombe; Martin V Sørensen; Steven H D Haddock; Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa; Akiko Okusu; Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen; Ward C Wheeler; Mark Q Martindale; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Phylogenetic signal in the eukaryotic tree of life.

Authors:  Michael J Sanderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  An alternative root for the eukaryote tree of life.

Authors:  Ding He; Omar Fiz-Palacios; Cheng-Jie Fu; Johanna Fehling; Chun-Chieh Tsai; Sandra L Baldauf
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Rooting the eukaryotic tree with mitochondrial and bacterial proteins.

Authors:  Romain Derelle; B Franz Lang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Robinson-Foulds supertrees.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; J Gordon Burleigh; Oliver Eulenstein; David Fernández-Baca
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships.

Authors:  K S Pick; H Philippe; F Schreiber; D Erpenbeck; D J Jackson; P Wrede; M Wiens; A Alié; B Morgenstern; M Manuel; G Wörheide
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Lost branches on the tree of life.

Authors:  Bryan T Drew; Romina Gazis; Patricia Cabezas; Kristen S Swithers; Jiabin Deng; Roseana Rodriguez; Laura A Katz; Keith A Crandall; David S Hibbett; Douglas E Soltis
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Origins of major archaeal clades correspond to gene acquisitions from bacteria.

Authors:  Shijulal Nelson-Sathi; Filipa L Sousa; Mayo Roettger; Nabor Lozada-Chávez; Thorsten Thiergart; Arnold Janssen; David Bryant; Giddy Landan; Peter Schönheit; Bettina Siebers; James O McInerney; William F Martin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  147 in total

1.  Insights into the life of an oxygenic phototroph.

Authors:  William B Whitman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Applying evolutionary genetics to developmental toxicology and risk assessment.

Authors:  Maxwell C K Leung; Andrew C Procter; Jared V Goldstone; Jonathan Foox; Robert DeSalle; Carolyn J Mattingly; Mark E Siddall; Alicia R Timme-Laragy
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  Rate dynamics of ectotherm responses to thermal stress.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kovacevic; Guillaume Latombe; Steven L Chown
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Meta-analysis reveals that animal sexual signalling behaviour is honest and resource based.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  The island rule explains consistent patterns of body size evolution in terrestrial vertebrates.

Authors:  Mark A J Huijbregts; Joseph A Tobias; Ana Benítez-López; Luca Santini; Juan Gallego-Zamorano; Borja Milá; Patrick Walkden
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 15.460

6.  Opinion: Why we need a centralized repository for isotopic data.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pauli; Seth D Newsome; Joseph A Cook; Chris Harrod; Shawn A Steffan; Christopher J O Baker; Merav Ben-David; David Bloom; Gabriel J Bowen; Thure E Cerling; Carla Cicero; Craig Cook; Michelle Dohm; Prarthana S Dharampal; Gary Graves; Robert Gropp; Keith A Hobson; Chris Jordan; Bruce MacFadden; Suzanne Pilaar Birch; Jorrit Poelen; Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Laura Russell; Craig A Stricker; Mark D Uhen; Christopher T Yarnes; Brian Hayden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Multispecies coalescent delimits structure, not species.

Authors:  Jeet Sukumaran; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Probing the Depths of Biological Diversity During the Second Century of GENETICS.

Authors:  Linnea Sandell; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Handling Stress and Sample Storage Are Associated with Weaker Complement-Mediated Bactericidal Ability in Birds but Not Bats.

Authors:  Daniel J Becker; Gábor Á Czirják; Agnieszka Rynda-Apple; Raina K Plowright
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.247

10.  APPLES: Scalable Distance-Based Phylogenetic Placement with or without Alignments.

Authors:  Metin Balaban; Shahab Sarmashghi; Siavash Mirarab
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 15.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.