Literature DB >> 26385626

Long-term outcomes of bone augmentation on soft and hard-tissue stability: a systematic review.

Rainer Lutz1, Friedrich W Neukam1, Massimo Simion2, Christian M Schmitt1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peri-implant hard-tissue augmentation is a widely used clinical procedure. AIM: The present review aimed to analyse the current literature regarding medium- and long-term data concerning the stability of peri-implant tissues after hard-tissue augmentation prior or immediately with implant placement.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed using Medline (PubMed) databases detecting clinical studies focusing on hard- and soft-tissue stability around dental implants placed either in augmented alveolar ridges or simultaneously with peri-implant bone grafting. The search was limited to articles published between 1995 and December 2014, focusing on clinical studies with a prospective study design assessing peri-implant bone and soft tissue stability over time with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Recent publications were also searched manually to find any relevant studies that might have been missed using the search criteria noted above.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Since the outcome measures and methods, as well as types of grafts and implants used were so heterogeneous, the performance of meta-analysis was impossible. The highest level of evidence was achieved by randomized clinical trials.
CONCLUSION: Different hard-tissue augmentation procedures seem to show stable peri-implant tissues, although, up to now, long-term stability of the augmented buccal bone is assessed by only few studies. Further research should concentrate on combining three-dimensional radiographic data with non-invasive methods as digital surface measuring techniques or ultrasound evaluation.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT imaging; bone regeneration; clinical research; clinical trials; guided tissue regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26385626     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of bone formation and membrane resorption in guided bone regeneration using deproteinized bovine bone mineral versus calcium sulfate.

Authors:  Alessandro Gavazzoni; Liogi Iwaki Filho; Luzmarina Hernandes
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Self-assembling Peptide P11-4 and Fluoride for Regenerating Enamel.

Authors:  M Alkilzy; A Tarabaih; R M Santamaria; C H Splieth
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Bone formation with functionalized 3D printed poly-ε-caprolactone scaffold with plasma-rich-fibrin implanted in critical-sized calvaria defect of rat.

Authors:  Min-Chia Chen; Hsien-Chung Chiu; Po-Jan Kuo; Cheng-Yang Chiang; Martin M Fu; Earl Fu
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 4.  Horizontal augmentation techniques in the mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ralf Smeets; Levi Matthies; Peter Windisch; Martin Gosau; Ronald Jung; Nadine Brodala; Martina Stefanini; Johannes Kleinheinz; Michael Payer; Anders Henningsen; Bilal Al-Nawas; Christian Knipfer
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-05-09

5.  Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with versus without resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchi; Elisabetta Vignudelli; Debora Franceschi; Emanuele Randellini; Giuseppe Lizio; Antonino Fiorino; Giuseppe Corinaldesi
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.021

6.  Preoperative buccal bone volume predicts long-term graft retention following augmentation in the esthetic zone: A retrospective case series.

Authors:  Balazs Feher; Florian Frommlet; Christian Ulm; Reinhard Gruber; Ulrike Kuchler
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.021

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.