| Literature DB >> 26385465 |
Xi Huang1,2,3, Lu Dong4,5, Chenglin Zhang6, Yanyun Zhang2.
Abstract
Avian blood parasites have been preliminarily studied in East Asia, but no data are available from long-term monitoring. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, genetic diversity, and temporal dynamics of Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, and Leucocytozoon in two passerine communities (one forest and one urban) in north China from 2008 to 2013, as well as the association between infected lineages and host specificities. Out of 633 birds from 40 species, 157 individuals (24.8 %) were infected; overall prevalence was 26.7 % and 16.8 % in two sites, respectively. The dominant avian blood parasite genus in the forest park changed yearly between Plasmodium and Haemoproteus, while the Leucocytozoon maintained a low infection level. Forty-four haplotypes were identified by sequencing a 432-bp fragment of the cytochrome b (cyt b) gene; more than 70 % were novel (six Plasmodium lineages, 16 Haemoproteus lineages, and nine Leucocytozoon lineages). Based on our data gathered over consecutive years, we found that the highly observed lineages of Haemoproteus showed higher host diversities than those of Plasmodium, and the most infected lineage EMEL01 (100 % identity with SGS1) take on the highest host diversity but low temporal diversity of the two genera, implying that this lineage infected a great diversity of species in certain years, but maintained a lower infection level or even disappeared in other years. The results suggest that genetic diversity of avian blood parasites in East Asia is high and provides scope for further research. In addition, compared with overall analysis, yearly prevalence monitoring is important in uncovering the temporal dynamic and host specificity variations over time.Entities:
Keywords: Avian blood parasites; Lineage diversity; Phylogeny; Prevalence; Temporal dynamic
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26385465 PMCID: PMC4602065 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4695-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Summary of blood parasite lineages identified in passerines in Beijing, frequency of their identification in each sites, and BLAST result were shown according to the MalAvi database
| Genus | Haplotype | Frequency | Frequency Ba | Frequency Xb | BLAST lineage | Identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| EMEL01 | 31 | 0 | 31 | SGS1 | 479/479 (100 %) |
| PAPA01 | 1 | 0 | 1 | SGS1 | 458/459 (99 %) | |
| EMGO01 | 2 | 0 | 2 | GRW06 | 478/479 (99 %) | |
| EMGO02 | 1 | 0 | 1 | SGS1 | 477/479 (99 %) | |
| EMEL02 | 6 | 0 | 6 | ALARV04 | 479/479 (100 %) | |
| PAMO01 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ALARV04 | 478/479 (99 %) | |
| PAPA02 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ALARV04 | 418/420 (99 %) | |
| PHPR01 | 5 | 0 | 5 | SYBOR02 | 433/433 (100 %) | |
| FIPA01 | 5 | 2 | 3 | BT7 | 479/479 (100 %) | |
| ANHO01 | 1 | 1 | 0 | BT7 | 474/475 (99 %) | |
| ANHO02 | 7 | 2 | 5 | TURDUS1 | 479/479 (100 %) | |
| SATO01 | 1 | 1 | 0 | EMSPO06 | 479/479 (100 %) | |
|
| ACAE01 | 21 | 3 | 18 | RW2 | 474/476 (99 %) |
| PHPR02 | 2 | 0 | 2 | RW2 | 476/479 (99 %) | |
| AECA01 | 2 | 0 | 2 | RW2 | 475/479 (99 %) | |
| AECA02 | 2 | 0 | 2 | RW2 | 458/461 (99 %) | |
| AECA03 | 16 | 4 | 12 | FIPAR02 | 446/447 (99 %) | |
| EMEL03 | 19 | 2 | 17 | HLW1 | 478/478 (100 %) | |
| MUDA01 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ROBIN1 | 472/476 (99 %) | |
| AECA04 | 1 | 0 | 1 | FIPAR02 | 462/464 (99 %) | |
| ANHO03 | 4 | 4 | 0 | YWT3 | 477/479 (99 %) | |
| EMGO03 | 1 | 0 | 1 | EMSPO01 | 479/479 (100 %) | |
| EMTR01 | 1 | 0 | 1 | RW2 | 476/479 (99 % | |
| FIPA02 | 1 | 1 | 0 | PAGRI04 | 419/431 (97 %) | |
| FIPA03 | 1 | 1 | 0 | FIPAR02 | 459/464 (99 %) | |
| PAMA01 | 1 | 0 | 1 | RW2 | 476/479 (99 %) | |
| PAMA02 | 1 | 0 | 1 | RW2 | 476/479 (99 %) | |
| PHPR03 | 1 | 0 | 1 | RW2 | 475/479 (99 %) | |
|
| EMPU02 | 1 | 0 | 1 | TROAED09 | 470/478 (98 %) |
| PAMA03 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PYJOC02 | 440/450 (98 %) | |
| PAMA04 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PYJOC02 | 467/476 (98 %) | |
| PAVE01 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PYJOC02 | 394/404 (98 %) | |
| PAMO02 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PYJOC02 | 419/428 (98 %) | |
| PAVE02 | 1 | 0 | 1 | TRPIP2 | 416/422 (99 %) | |
| PAVE03 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PARUS8 | 444/446 (99 %) | |
| PHIN01 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PARUS8 | 418/430 (97 %) | |
| PHPR04 | 1 | 0 | 1 | RS2 | 430/430 (100 %) | |
| SIEU01 | 1 | 0 | 1 | HYBOR02 | 446/446 (100 %) | |
| PHPR05 | 4 | 0 | 4 | BT5 | 383/383 (100 %) | |
| EMTR02 | 1 | 0 | 1 | SBBS1 | 426/430 (99 %) | |
| FIPA04 | 1 | 1 | 0 | SFC8 | 401/401 (100 %) | |
| TACY01 | 1 | 0 | 1 | BT1 | 428/428 (100 %) | |
| Undefinedc | CAPU01 | 1 | 1 | 0 | FULEU01 | 298/316 (94 %) |
| EMPU01 | 1 | 1 | 0 | SW3 | 300/315 (95 %) |
aFrequency in the BNU campus (B)
bFrequency in Xiaolongmen Forest Park (X)
cThese two haplotypes both showed the closest relationship with lineages belonging to Haemoproteus according to BLAST result, but clustered together with Leucocytozoon lineages in phylogenetic tree with low support
Fig. 1Annual variation (2008–2013) in prevalence of avian blood parasites in passerines in Beijing. a Total samples. b Xiaolongmen Forest Park. c BNU campus. P Plasmodium, H Haemoproteus, and L Leucocytozoon
Fig. 2Bayesian cyt b phylogenetic tree of blood parasite haplotypes reconstructed under TN93 + I + G model. Posterior probabilities over 0.7 are listed above nodes. Novel lineages are indicated in bold. The lineages only detected in Xiaolongmen Forest Park were underlined, and only detected in BNU campus were double underlined. Morphospecies were labeled after the lineage in brackets
Host diversity and temporal diversity of the eight most frequently detected lineages in Xiaolongmen Forest Park
| Lineage | Genus | Host diversity | Temporal diversity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Host speciesa (sample size) |
| Sampled year (sample size) |
| ||
| EMEL02 |
| Emel (1), Pamo (4), Pave (1) | 1.25 | 2009 (1), 2010 (1), 2011 (1), 2012 (1), 2013 (2) | 2.25 |
| EMEL01 |
| Pama (3), Pamo (5), Pave (4), Emel (5), Emgo (3), Sieu (6), Papa (5) | 2.77 | 2009 (25), 2011 (5), 2012 (1) | 0.83 |
| PHPR01 |
| Phpr (1)¸Tacy (4) | 0.72 | 2009 (3), 2012 (2) | 0.97 |
| ANHO02 |
| Tacy (5) | 0 | 2009 (4), 2011 (1) | 0.72 |
| AECA03 |
| Pama (1), Tacy (9), Emel (1), Aeca (1) | 1.21 | 2009 (5), 2012 (7) | 0.98 |
| EMEL03 |
| Phin (2), Emel (7), Emgo (1), Fiel (1), Pama (2), Pamo (4) | 2.51 | 2011 (2), 2013 (15) | 0.59 |
| ACAE01 |
| Pama (5), Pamo (2), Tacy (1), Pave (2), Emel (1), Phpr (3), Sieu (3), Aeca (1) | 2.77 | 2009 (3), 2010 (3), 2011 (3), 2012 (2), 2013 (7) | 2.17 |
| PHPR05 |
| Phpr (3), Tacy (1) | 0.81 | 2011 (2), 2013 (2) | 1.00 |
S host species diversity index, T temporal sampling diversity index
aSpecies codes correspond to species names in Table S1