Literature DB >> 26385414

Asynchronous vascular consultation via electronic methods: A feasibility pilot.

Melissa D Chittle1, Sandhya K Rao2, Michael R Jaff3, Virendra I Patel4, Kathleen M Gallen5, Radhika Avadhani6, Timothy G Ferris2, Jason H Wasfy7.   

Abstract

Management of chronic disease often requires multidisciplinary clinical efforts and specialist care. With the emergence of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), health care systems are incentivized to evaluate methods of information exchange between generalists and specialists in order to provide value while preserving quality. Our objective was to evaluate patient and referring provider satisfaction and outcomes of asynchronous electronic consultations in vascular care in a large tertiary academic medical center. Referring providers were offered a vascular 'e-consult' option through an electronic referral management system. We conducted chart review to understand the downstream effects and surveyed patients and referring providers to assess satisfaction. From 24 March 2014 to 1 March 2015, 54 e-consults were completed. Additional testing and recommendations were made in 49/54 (90.7%) e-consults, including lower-extremity venous duplex ultrasonography with reflux testing, duplex ultrasonography of the carotid artery, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, non-invasive physiology arterial studies, laboratory tests, medications, compression stockings, and sequential lymphedema compression therapy. Referring providers were compliant with recommendations in 40/49 (81.6%) of e-consults. A total of 17/54 (31.5%) patients were surveyed with a median patient satisfaction score of 13.7/15 (91.3%) (SD ± 6.4). The program was associated with high referring provider satisfaction, with 87.0% finding the e-consult very helpful and 80.0% stating it averted the need for a traditional visit. Our experience suggests that e-consults are an effective way to provide vascular care in some patients and are associated with high patient and provider satisfaction. E-consults may therefore be an efficient method of care delivery for vascular patients within an ACO.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accountable Care Organization (ACO); asynchronous consult; care delivery; chronic disease management; e-consult; vascular care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26385414     DOI: 10.1177/1358863X15601734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Med        ISSN: 1358-863X            Impact factor:   3.239


  7 in total

1.  Initial experience with endocrinology e-consults.

Authors:  Jason H Wasfy; Sandhya K Rao; Utibe R Essien; Calvin A Richardson; Tamika Jeune; Susan A Goldstein; Elizabeth Laikhter; Melissa D Chittle; Michelle Weil; Marc Wein; Timothy G Ferris
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Electronic consultations (E-consults) and their outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Varsha G Vimalananda; Jay D Orlander; Melissa K Afable; B Graeme Fincke; Amanda K Solch; Seppo T Rinne; Eun Ji Kim; Sarah L Cutrona; Dylan D Thomas; Judith L Strymish; Steven R Simon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  The Use of Electronic Consultations in Outpatient Surgery Clinics: Synthesized Narrative Review.

Authors:  Thomas Payne; Jasmina Kevric; Wanda Stelmach; Henry To
Journal:  JMIR Perioper Med       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance access to specialist care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mohamed A Osman; Kara Schick-Makaroff; Stephanie Thompson; Liza Bialy; Robin Featherstone; Julia Kurzawa; Deenaz Zaidi; Ikechi Okpechi; Syed Habib; Soroush Shojai; Kailash Jindal; Branko Braam; Erin Keely; Clare Liddy; Braden Manns; Marcello Tonelli; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Scott Klarenbach; Aminu K Bello
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-09-13

Review 5.  Academic Radiology Departmental Operational Strategy Related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Authors:  Anand M Prabhakar; McKinley Glover; Pamela W Schaefer; James A Brink
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 6.  Rationale for setting up a cardio-oncology unit: our experience at Mayo Clinic.

Authors:  Sergio Barros-Gomes; Joerg Herrmann; Sharon L Mulvagh; Amir Lerman; Grace Lin; Hector R Villarraga
Journal:  Cardiooncology       Date:  2016-04-19

Review 7.  The Radiology Virtual Reading Room: During and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Joseph H Yacoub; Carl E Swanson; Ann K Jay; Cirrelda Cooper; James Spies; Pranay Krishnan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 4.056

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.