PURPOSE: To present clinical results regarding the treatment of patients with age-related macular degeneration (neovascular form) after the implementation of a 'virtual' type of follow-up in a single retina service centre. METHODS: Retrospective study based on the clinical records of the Leicester Royal Infirmary Retina department. Two periods were compared, the 2-year period of 2011-2012 and the following one of 2012-2013 when the 'virtual' clinics model applied in the department. Primary outcomes were as follows: the time between two appointments, follow-up or treatment and the number of patients with significant (>15 letters) improvement of their best corrected distance visual acuity. Secondary parameters of interest were as follows: mean number of injections per patient/year and the average duration of a 'virtual' vs. a regular visit. RESULTS: The mean time interval between two appointments was 5.3 weeks following the implementation of the 'virtual' clinics compared to 6.9 weeks in the previous period of regular appointments. Mean visual acuity improvement >15 letters was achieved in 6.9% of the patients compared to 23.1% of the 'virtual' appointments period. The results regarding injections/patient/year were as follows: 5.6 before the model of 'virtual' appointments and 5.9 after the implementation. The average time a patient spent for a conventional visit was 71.4 ± 24.1 min, and the respective time needed in the virtual clinic was 47.3 ± 18.6 min. CONCLUSION: The model of 'virtual' (without actual consultation) follow-up appointments assisted our service to contend with the increased number of patient. In general, the specific pattern of patients' management could be widely considered obviously after comprehensive and all-embracing assessment of its safety and efficiency.
PURPOSE: To present clinical results regarding the treatment of patients with age-related macular degeneration (neovascular form) after the implementation of a 'virtual' type of follow-up in a single retina service centre. METHODS: Retrospective study based on the clinical records of the Leicester Royal Infirmary Retina department. Two periods were compared, the 2-year period of 2011-2012 and the following one of 2012-2013 when the 'virtual' clinics model applied in the department. Primary outcomes were as follows: the time between two appointments, follow-up or treatment and the number of patients with significant (>15 letters) improvement of their best corrected distance visual acuity. Secondary parameters of interest were as follows: mean number of injections per patient/year and the average duration of a 'virtual' vs. a regular visit. RESULTS: The mean time interval between two appointments was 5.3 weeks following the implementation of the 'virtual' clinics compared to 6.9 weeks in the previous period of regular appointments. Mean visual acuity improvement >15 letters was achieved in 6.9% of the patients compared to 23.1% of the 'virtual' appointments period. The results regarding injections/patient/year were as follows: 5.6 before the model of 'virtual' appointments and 5.9 after the implementation. The average time a patient spent for a conventional visit was 71.4 ± 24.1 min, and the respective time needed in the virtual clinic was 47.3 ± 18.6 min. CONCLUSION: The model of 'virtual' (without actual consultation) follow-up appointments assisted our service to contend with the increased number of patient. In general, the specific pattern of patients' management could be widely considered obviously after comprehensive and all-embracing assessment of its safety and efficiency.
Authors: Leonard M Coulibaly; Stefan Sacu; Philipp Fuchs; Hrvoje Bogunovic; Georg Faustmann; Christian Unterrainer; Gregor S Reiter; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: Richard P Gale; Sajjad Mahmood; Helen Devonport; Praveen J Patel; Adam H Ross; Gavin Walters; Louise Downey; Samer El-Sherbiny; Mary Freeman; Simon Berry; Nitin Jain Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Noemi Lois; Jonathan A Cook; Ariel Wang; Stephen Aldington; Hema Mistry; Mandy Maredza; Danny McAuley; Tariq Aslam; Clare Bailey; Victor Chong; Faruque Ganchi; Peter Scanlon; Sobha Sivaprasad; David H Steel; Caroline Styles; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Lindsay Prior; Norman Waugh Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Carolina C S Valentim; Justin C Muste; Amogh I Iyer; Michael A Krause; Aneesha Kalur; Steve W Gendi; Marc Ohlhausen; Aleksandra Rachitskaya; Rishi P Singh; Katherine E Talcott Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Winfried Amoaku; Clare Bailey; Louise Downey; Richard P Gale; Faruque Ghanchi; Robin Hamilton; Sajjad Mahmood; Geeta Menon; Jenny Nosek; Ian Pearce; Yit Yang Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2020-05-15