Literature DB >> 26384990

Esse est percipi & verum factum est.

Jan Koenderink1,2,3.   

Abstract

I go into the historical roots of the fundamental issues relating to the "interface theory of perception," concentrating on the sciences rather than on philosophy. The basic ideas have been around throughout historical time. In modern times--I concentrate on a period straddling 1900--they became perhaps "respectable," although interest has dwindled in the recent, post-World War II period. This has been due to an ill-conceived reliance on "physical reality" that has shaped the sciences and philosophy alike. An investigation of the historical development of these ideas serves to shed additional light on various topics treated in the target article (D.D.Hoffman, M.Singh and C.Prakash: The interface theory of perception (this issue)).

Keywords:  Visual awareness; Visual meaning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26384990     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0754-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  4 in total

1.  Separate geometric and non-geometric modules for spatial reorientation: evidence from a lopsided animal brain.

Authors:  Giorgio Vallortigara; Piero Pagni; Valeria Anna Sovrano
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Q....

Authors:  Jan Koenderink
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  The all seeing eye?

Authors:  Jan Koenderink
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Is the mind in the head? A belated response to Koenderink (1999).

Authors:  Christopher Tyler
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.490

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.