Literature DB >> 26384603

Isolated abnormal strict morphology is not a contraindication for intrauterine insemination.

G M Lockwood1, N E Deveneau2, A N Shridharani1, E Y Strawn2, J I Sandlow1.   

Abstract

This study sought to investigate whether isolated abnormal strict morphology (<5% normal forms) and very low strict morphology (0-1% normal forms) affects pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination (IUI). This was a retrospective study performed at an Academic Medical Center/Reproductive Medicine Center. Four hundred and eight couples were included for 856 IUI cycles. 70 IUI cycles were performed in couples with abnormal strict morphology and otherwise normal semen parameters. Outcomes were measured as clinical pregnancy rate per IUI cycle as documented by fetal heart activity on maternal ultrasound. Clinical pregnancy rate did not significantly differ between the group with abnormal strict morphology [11/70 (15.7%)] and the normal morphology group [39/281 (13.9%)]. Additionally, there was no significant difference between the pregnancy rate in the abnormal morphology group compared to that of our overall institutional IUI pregnancy rate [145/856 (16.9%)]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between pregnancy rate in the very low morphology group [3/14 (21.4%)] compared to those with normal morphology or the overall IUI pregnancy rate. Patients with isolated abnormal strict morphology have clinical pregnancy rates similar to those with normal morphology for IUI. Even in those with very low normal forms, consideration of IUI for assisted reproduction should not be excluded.
© 2015 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted reproductive technology; intrauterine insemination; male infertility; strict sperm morphology; teratozoospermia

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26384603     DOI: 10.1111/andr.12098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  7 in total

1.  Investigation on the origin of sperm morphological defects: oxidative attacks, chromatin immaturity, and DNA fragmentation.

Authors:  Ammar Oumaima; Ajina Tesnim; Haouas Zohra; Sallem Amira; Zidi Ines; Chakroun Sana; Grissa Intissar; Ezzi Lobna; Jlali Ali; Mehdi Meriem
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Role of Abnormal Sperm Morphology in Predicting Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel A Shabtaie; Sabrina A Gerkowicz; Taylor P Kohn; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Sperm quality and paternal age: effect on blastocyst formation and pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Aurélie Chapuis; Anna Gala; Alice Ferrières-Hoa; Tiffany Mullet; Sophie Bringer-Deutsch; Emmanuelle Vintejoux; Antoine Torre; Samir Hamamah
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2017-01-21

4.  Sperm DNA fragmentation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ahmad Majzoub; Ashok Agarwal; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

5.  Assessing the clinical value of the Kruger strict morphology criteria over the World Health Organization fourth edition criteria.

Authors:  Gal Wald; Nahid Punjani; Russell Hayden; Miriam Feliciano; Vanessa Dudley; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-04-19

6.  Oxidation-reduction potential and sperm DNA fragmentation, and their associations with sperm morphological anomalies amongst fertile and infertile men.

Authors:  Ahmad Majzoub; Mohamad Arafa; Mohamed Mahdi; Ashok Agarwal; Sami Al Said; Ibrahim Al-Emadi; Walid El Ansari; Alia Alattar; Khalid Al Rumaihi; Haitham Elbardisi
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-02-01

7.  Sperm morphology from the actual inseminated sample does not predict clinical pregnancy following intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Jamie Stanhiser; Jennifer E Mersereau; Daquan Dock; Caitlin Boylan; Hunter Caprell; R Matthew Coward; Dara S Berger; Marc Fritz
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-12-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.