Literature DB >> 26384274

Hypoxia and Predicting Radiation Response.

Richard P Hill1, Robert G Bristow2, Anthony Fyles3, Marianne Koritzinsky4, Michael Milosevic3, Bradly G Wouters2.   

Abstract

The results from many studies indicate that most solid tumors, regardless of site of origin, contain hypoxic regions. Experimental studies have demonstrated that, apart from the well-known protective effect of hypoxia on the radiation response of cells and tissues, hypoxic conditions can also result in modified gene expression patterns, causing (to a greater or lesser extent in different cell populations) genomic instability, increased invasive capacity, higher propensity to metastasize, enhanced stem cell properties, and ability to survive nutrient deprivation. Clinical trials of hypoxia-targeted treatments have demonstrated improved local tumor control and patient survival in a number of tumor sites. However, our improved understanding of the underlying biology of cellular responses to hypoxia, and its potential interactions with the heterogeneous nature of tumor phenotypes, makes it likely that not every tumor that contains regions of hypoxia would necessarily need (or benefit from) such treatments. New more effective treatments are emerging, but it is likely that these treatments would have the biggest clinical effect in situations where tumor hypoxia is a primary driver of cancer behavior. The challenge for the Radiation Oncology community is the development of robust precision cancer medicine strategies for identifying patients with such tumors, in the setting of other etiological, genomic, and host-tumor factors, and treating these patients with the appropriate hypoxia-targeting strategy to reduce the effect of hypoxia on radiation treatment response. In this context, it is important to consider not only the hypoxic state of the tumor at diagnosis but also the changing characteristics of this state during the course of treatment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26384274     DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2015.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  31 in total

Review 1.  The changing paradigm of tumour response to irradiation.

Authors:  Richard P Hill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  The potential roles of bacteria to improve radiation treatment outcome.

Authors:  E Kouhsari; A Ghadimi-Daresajini; H Abdollahi; N Amirmozafari; S R Mahdavi; S Abbasian; S H Mousavi; H F Yaseri; M Moghaderi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Hypoxia-Mediated Mechanisms Associated with Antiangiogenic Treatment Resistance in Glioblastomas.

Authors:  Sean Mahase; Rachel N Rattenni; Pieter Wesseling; William Leenders; Clarissa Baldotto; Rajan Jain; David Zagzag
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  Emerging biomarkers for the combination of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockers.

Authors:  Claire Lhuillier; Claire Vanpouille-Box; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Silvia Chiara Formenti; Sandra Demaria
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 15.707

5.  Development and validation of a hypoxia-related gene pair signature to predict overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhao Ding; Hefeng Li; Deshun Yu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Molecular Predictors of Radiotherapy Response in Sarcoma.

Authors:  Carlos H F Chan; Philip Wong
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-01

7.  Modelling reoxygenation effects in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines and showing epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Joanna Kapeleris; Juliana Müller Bark; Shanon Ranjit; Derek Richard; Ian Vela; Kenneth O'Byrne; Chamindie Punyadeera
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.322

8.  Photon, light ion, and heavy ion cancer radiotherapy: paths from physics and biology to clinical practice.

Authors:  Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

Review 9.  The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; James M Mountz; Brenda F Kurland; Richard L Wahl; Ella F Jones; Nola M Hylton; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Robert J Nordstrom; Lori Henderson; Karen A Kurdziel; Bhadrasain Vikram; Michael A Jacobs; Matthias Holdhoff; Edward Taylor; David A Jaffray; Lawrence H Schwartz; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan; Hannah M Linden; Philippe Lambin; Thomas J Dilling; Daniel L Rubin; Lubomir Hadjiiski; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Exploiting DNA repair pathways for tumor sensitization, mitigation of resistance, and normal tissue protection in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jac A Nickoloff; Lynn Taylor; Neelam Sharma; Takamitsu A Kato
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2021-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.