Literature DB >> 26384016

Improved Breast Cancer Care Quality Metrics After Implementation of a Standardized Tumor Board Documentation Template.

Daniel J Farrugia1, Trevan D Fischer1, Daniel Delitto1, Lisa R P Spiguel1, Christiana M Shaw2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer treatment requires a coordinated multidisciplinary treatment approach, which led to the development of the Rapid Quality Reporting System by the Commission on Cancer. However, the lack of immediate availability of documented treatment plans and the inefficiency of global medical record reviews represent significant barriers to adherence reporting and the timely implementation of quality improvement measures.
METHODS: Adherence to national guidelines in the areas of radiation treatment, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy was assessed after breast conservation surgery (BCS). Adherence rates within 1 year of BCS were analyzed 10 weeks before and after the implementation of a standardized documentation template at weekly multidisciplinary breast cancer conferences.
RESULTS: Documented adherence rates increased postimplementation in patients undergoing consideration for both radiation treatment and hormone therapy within 1 year of BCS (89% v 65%; P = .045% and 85% v 62%; P = .002, respectively). No change was observed in patients undergoing evaluation for cytotoxic chemotherapy (80% v 85%; P = 1.00).
CONCLUSION: The addition of a documentation template to multidisciplinary breast cancer conferences resulted in increased recorded adherence rates to national guidelines. This template provided a means of both accurate and efficient documentation of evidence-based practice, which represents a concept with broad application in quality improvement. Although evaluation of the project was not continued beyond the pilot stage, current quality measure scores remain within the same range.
Copyright © 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26384016     DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2015.003988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  15 in total

Review 1.  Multidisciplinary care of breast cancer patients: a scoping review of multidisciplinary styles, processes, and outcomes.

Authors:  J Shao; M Rodrigues; A L Corter; N N Baxter
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Integrated precision medicine: the role of electronic health records in delivering personalized treatment.

Authors:  Amy Sitapati; Hyeoneui Kim; Barbara Berkovich; Rebecca Marmor; Siddharth Singh; Robert El-Kareh; Brian Clay; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2017-02-16

Review 3.  Medicolegal Considerations in Multidisciplinary Cancer Care.

Authors:  Pamela L Karas; Nicole M Rankin; Emily Stone
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2020-07-03

4.  Second Opinions From Medical Oncologists for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Prevalence, Correlates, and Consequences.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Christopher R Friese; Irina Bondarenko; Reshma Jagsi; Yun Li; Ann S Hamilton; Kevin C Ward; Steven J Katz
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 33.006

5.  Time to add screening for financial hardship as a quality measure?

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley; K Robin Yabroff; S Yousuf Zafar; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 286.130

6.  "A rising tide lifts all boats": establishing a multidisciplinary genomic tumor board for breast cancer patients with advanced disease.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Roselle S Ponsaran; Paula Silverman; Lyndsay N Harris; Patricia A Marshall
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study.

Authors:  Nicole M Rankin; Gemma K Collett; Clare M Brown; Tim J Shaw; Kahren M White; Philip J Beale; Lyndal J Trevena; Cleola Anderiesz; David J Barnes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Clinical decision trees support systematic evaluation of multidisciplinary team recommendations.

Authors:  Mathijs P Hendriks; Xander A A M Verbeek; Jeannette G van Manen; Sannah E van der Heijden; Shirley H L Go; Gea A Gooiker; Thijs van Vegchel; Sabine Siesling; Agnes Jager
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Enhancing the performance of gastrointestinal tumour board by improving documentation.

Authors:  Roaa Saleh Alsuhaibani; Hajer Alzahrani; Ghada Algwaiz; Haneen Alfarhan; Ashwaq Alolayan; Nafisa Abdelhafiz; Yosra Ali; Abdul Rahman Jazieh
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2018-03-14

10.  A New Software Platform to Improve Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Workflows and User Satisfaction: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Merce Comas; Leia Garrote Gallego
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2018-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.