Literature DB >> 26383612

Focused Dual-energy CT Maintains Diagnostic and Compositional Accuracy for Urolithiasis Using Ultralow-dose Noncontrast CT.

Konrad Wilhelm1, Martin Schoenthaler2, Simon Hein2, Fabian Adams2, Daniel Schlager2, Franklin Emmanuel Kuehhas3, Sabina Sevcenco3, Gregor Pache4, Mathias Langer4, Stefan Bulla4, Arkadiusz Miernik2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new energy and radiation dose-reduced protocol for noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) with dual-energy CT (DECT) analysis and its potential for the compositional analysis of uric acid (UA)- or non-uric acid (N-UA)-containing calculi.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was carried out in 61 patients who underwent dose-reduced DECT (tube A: 140 kV/55 mAs; tube B: 80 kV/303 mAs) with a tube current 38.8% lower than that set by the manufacturer. A protocol combining low-dose CT and targeted DE scans was used. Urinary stones were detected and classified as UA- or N-UA-containing or mixed based on DE software results. The accuracy of the compositional analysis was controlled by correlation with conventional infrared-based analysis.
RESULTS: The compositional stone differentiation was correct in 58 of 61 (95.1%) patients. The sensitivity of detecting pure UA-containing and pure N-UA-containing stones was 100%. The specificity of detecting UA- and pure N-UA-containing stones was 100% and 78.57%, respectively, as 3 of 7 mixed urinary stones (small fragments <4 mm) were classified as N-UA calculi. The total radiation dose in patients with body mass index <25 and >25 kg/m(2) was 1.2 and 2.5 mSv, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Lowering the DECT tube current by up to 38% of the manufacturer's recommendations allows a reduced radiation dose without impairing detection accuracy and stone compositional analysis. Compared with previous studies, this protocol might significantly decrease patient radiation exposure without affecting the quality of results.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26383612     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Acute vertebral fracture after spinal fusion: a case report illustrating the added value of single-source dual-energy computed tomography to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with spinal Instrumentation.

Authors:  M Fuchs; M Putzier; M Pumberger; K G Hermann; T Diekhoff
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Imaging of flank pain: readdressing state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Priyanka Jha; Brian Bentley; Spencer Behr; Judy Yee; Ronald Zagoria
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-09-10

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a prospective trial and protocol for clinical implementation.

Authors:  Tim Nestler; Kai Nestler; Andreas Neisius; Hendrik Isbarn; Christopher Netsch; Stephan Waldeck; Hans U Schmelz; Christian Ruf
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [Update of the 2Sk guidelines on the diagnostics, treatment and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF register number 043-025) : What is new?]

Authors:  C Seitz; T Bach; M Bader; W Berg; T Knoll; A Neisius; C Netsch; M Nothacker; S Schmidt; M Schönthaler; R Siener; R Stein; M Straub; W Strohmaier; C Türk; B Volkmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  A new method for predicting uric acid composition in urinary stones using routine single-energy CT.

Authors:  Mats Lidén
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Percutaneous kidney stone surgery and radiation exposure: A review.

Authors:  Bohdan Baralo; Patrick Samson; David Hoenig; Arthur Smith
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-05-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.