Vito Romano1, Bernhard Steger, Yalin Zheng, Sajjad Ahmad, Colin E Willoughby, Stephen B Kaye. 1. *Department of Corneal and External Eye Diseases, St Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom; †Department of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; and ‡Department of Corneal and External Eye Diseases, St Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Department of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize corneal nevocoarization (CoNV) in vivo. METHODS: Patients with CoNV were categorized into those with active disease defined by the presence of corneal infiltrates and/or edema and those with inactive disease, the latter divided into those with or without corneal red blood cell traffic (RBCT). CoNV were imaged using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and angiography. Leakage and uptake of dye from the extravascular to intravascular space were investigated using repeat angiography and digital subtraction analysis. Vessel parameters and the presence of RBCT were analyzed using custom-designed software. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with CoNV were included: 4 had active and 9 had inactive disease with CoNV present for 3.5 ± 1.7 months and 30.2 ± 30.7 months, respectively. Using a combination of digital subtraction analysis and IVCM, presumed lymphatic vessels were detected only in patients with active CoNV. These vessels were characterized by an indistinct vessel wall, carrying nucleated cells, and on IVCM, it had a mean diameter of 19.7 ± 6.1 μm (11-30 μm). The ratio of the diameter of presumed lymphatic vessels to that of neighboring vessels was 0.6 ± 0.1 (0.5-0.6). Of the patients with inactive disease, 4 had CoNV with RBCT (mean age CoNV, 17.3 ± 7.6 months) and 5 (mean age CoNV, 40.6 ± 35 months) had CoNV without evidence of RBCT on biomicroscopy, but evident on angiography and IVCM. These represent perfused vessels with no or intermittent RBCT. CONCLUSIONS: CoNV can be characterized in vivo using a combination of IVCM and angiography. The vascular features vary according to the age of the CoNV and disease activity. Further improvements in angiographic image alignment, however, are needed.
PURPOSE: To characterize corneal nevocoarization (CoNV) in vivo. METHODS:Patients with CoNV were categorized into those with active disease defined by the presence of corneal infiltrates and/or edema and those with inactive disease, the latter divided into those with or without corneal red blood cell traffic (RBCT). CoNV were imaged using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and angiography. Leakage and uptake of dye from the extravascular to intravascular space were investigated using repeat angiography and digital subtraction analysis. Vessel parameters and the presence of RBCT were analyzed using custom-designed software. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with CoNV were included: 4 had active and 9 had inactive disease with CoNV present for 3.5 ± 1.7 months and 30.2 ± 30.7 months, respectively. Using a combination of digital subtraction analysis and IVCM, presumed lymphatic vessels were detected only in patients with active CoNV. These vessels were characterized by an indistinct vessel wall, carrying nucleated cells, and on IVCM, it had a mean diameter of 19.7 ± 6.1 μm (11-30 μm). The ratio of the diameter of presumed lymphatic vessels to that of neighboring vessels was 0.6 ± 0.1 (0.5-0.6). Of the patients with inactive disease, 4 had CoNV with RBCT (mean age CoNV, 17.3 ± 7.6 months) and 5 (mean age CoNV, 40.6 ± 35 months) had CoNV without evidence of RBCT on biomicroscopy, but evident on angiography and IVCM. These represent perfused vessels with no or intermittent RBCT. CONCLUSIONS: CoNV can be characterized in vivo using a combination of IVCM and angiography. The vascular features vary according to the age of the CoNV and disease activity. Further improvements in angiographic image alignment, however, are needed.
Authors: Yifan Wu; Young Jin Seong; Kin Li; Dongwon Choi; Eunkyung Park; George H Daghlian; Eunson Jung; Khoa Bui; Luping Zhao; Shrimika Madhavan; Saren Daghlian; Patill Daghlian; Desmond Chin; Il-Taeg Cho; Alex K Wong; Martin Heur; Sandy Zhang-Nunes; James C Tan; Masatsugu Ema; Tina T Wong; Alex S Huang; Young-Kwon Hong Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2020-07-09
Authors: Danial Roshandel; Medi Eslani; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Albert Y Cheung; Khaliq Kurji; Sayena Jabbehdari; Alejandra Maiz; Setareh Jalali; Ali R Djalilian; Edward J Holland Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Tisha P Stanzel; Kavya Devarajan; Nyein C Lwin; Gary H Yam; Leopold Schmetterer; Jodhbir S Mehta; Marcus Ang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Christoph Palme; Vito Romano; Matthias Brunner; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Stephen B Kaye; Bernhard Steger Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Mariantonia Ferrara; Giulia Coco; Tania Sorrentino; Kirti M Jasani; George Moussa; Francesco Morescalchi; Felipe Dhawahir-Scala; Francesco Semeraro; David H W Steel; Vito Romano; Mario R Romano Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 4.964