Margery L S Gass1, Cynthia A Stuenkel, Wulf H Utian, Andrea LaCroix, James H Liu, Jan L Shifren. 1. 1North American Menopause Society, Mayfield Heights, OH 2Endocrinology and Metabolism Service, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine 3Division of Epidemiology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 5Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A national survey was conducted to determine the extent of use of compounded hormone therapy (C-HT) and to characterize the differences between C-HT users and users of hormone therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA-HT users). METHODS: This Internet survey enrolled 3,725 women aged 40 to 84 years who were postmenopausal or experiencing the menopause transition. The sample was weighted slightly by age, region, education, and race to reflect population attributes based on US Census data. RESULTS: Overall, 9% of women were current users of HT, and 28% of all respondents were ever-users of HT. C-HT users represented 31% of ever-users of HT, 35% of current users of HT, and 41% of ever-users aged 40 to 49 years. Approximately 13% of ever-users indicated current or past use of testosterone. The most cited reason for using HT was vasomotor symptoms (∼70%). Nonapproved indications for using HT were selected more often by C-HT users. There were four reports of endometrial cancer among the 326 C-HT users compared with none reported among the 738 FDA-HT users. Significance was not determined because of small numbers. CONCLUSIONS: This survey indicates substantial use of C-HT across the country and the possibility of higher rates of endometrial side effects with such products. There is a need for standardized data collection on the extent of use of compounded hormones and their potential risks.
OBJECTIVE: A national survey was conducted to determine the extent of use of compounded hormone therapy (C-HT) and to characterize the differences between C-HT users and users of hormone therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA-HT users). METHODS: This Internet survey enrolled 3,725 women aged 40 to 84 years who were postmenopausal or experiencing the menopause transition. The sample was weighted slightly by age, region, education, and race to reflect population attributes based on US Census data. RESULTS: Overall, 9% of women were current users of HT, and 28% of all respondents were ever-users of HT. C-HT users represented 31% of ever-users of HT, 35% of current users of HT, and 41% of ever-users aged 40 to 49 years. Approximately 13% of ever-users indicated current or past use of testosterone. The most cited reason for using HT was vasomotor symptoms (∼70%). Nonapproved indications for using HT were selected more often by C-HT users. There were four reports of endometrial cancer among the 326 C-HT users compared with none reported among the 738 FDA-HT users. Significance was not determined because of small numbers. CONCLUSIONS: This survey indicates substantial use of C-HT across the country and the possibility of higher rates of endometrial side effects with such products. There is a need for standardized data collection on the extent of use of compounded hormones and their potential risks.
Authors: Rebecca B Lawn; Kristen M Nishimi; Yongjoo Kim; Sun Jae Jung; Andrea L Roberts; Jennifer A Sumner; Rebecca C Thurston; Lori B Chibnik; Eric B Rimm; Andrew D Ratanatharathorn; Shaili C Jha; Karestan C Koenen; Shelley S Tworoger; Laura D Kubzansky Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Huichu Li; Jaime E Hart; Shruthi Mahalingaiah; Rachel C Nethery; Trang VoPham; Elizabeth Bertone-Johnson; Francine Laden Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Ginger D Constantine; Dennis A Revicki; Risa Kagan; James A Simon; Shelli Graham; Brian Bernick; Sebastian Mirkin Journal: Menopause Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Chia-Chen Wu; Jeremiah N Shields; Camille Akemann; Danielle N Meyer; Mackenzie Connell; Bridget B Baker; David K Pitts; Tracie R Baker Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2020-11-14 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: James A Simon; Andrew M Kaunitz; Robin Kroll; Shelli Graham; Brian Bernick; Sebastian Mirkin Journal: Menopause Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Ginger D Constantine; Grant Kessler; Shelli Graham; Steven R Goldstein Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 2.681