Literature DB >> 26382052

Use of a novel polyp "ruler snare" improves estimation of colon polyp size.

Andrew M Kaz1, Asma Anwar2, Darby Robinson O'Neill3, Jason A Dominitz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prior studies have demonstrated that endoscopists' estimates of polyp size are imprecise. The aim of this study was to determine whether a modified polypectomy "ruler snare" improves the accuracy of assessment of polyp size in real time without the use of additional devices.
METHODS: Ten artificial polyps of predetermined sizes (4 to 25 mm) were affixed to the inside of a colon model. A standard polypectomy snare was modified by adding 5-mm graduated markings to the distal end of the plastic sheath. Study participants estimated the sizes of the artificial polyps during simulated colonoscopies, first using a standard snare and then with the modified ruler snare.
RESULTS: Thirty-four private practice and academic gastroenterologists participated in the study. Endoscopists' ability to accurately classify polyps by size (diminutive, small, or large) improved from 48.5% to 60.3% with the ruler snare (P = .002). The greatest improvement in precision was seen among the large polyps, where accuracy increased from 35.9% to 58.2% with use of the ruler snare (P < .0001). Participants underestimated polyp size by a mean of 3.6 mm (interquartile range, -5 to -2 mm) with the standard snare and 1.8 mm (interquartile range, -3 to 0 mm) with the ruler snare, which corresponded to a 44.2% improvement in accuracy with the ruler snare (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The modified ruler snare improved polyp size assessment compared with a standard snare, particularly with large polyps. Overall, although size estimation continues to be imprecise, the addition of calibrated markings to a polypectomy snare is a simple and likely low-cost means to improve neoplasia surveillance recommendations.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26382052     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  5 in total

1.  Variation between Pathological Measurement and Endoscopically Estimated Size of Colonic Polyps.

Authors:  Catarina Atalaia-Martins; Pedro Marcos; Carina Leal; Sandra Barbeiro; Alexandra Fernandes; Antonieta Santos; Liliana Eliseu; Cláudia Gonçalves; Isabel Cotrim; Helena Vasconcelos
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-27

2.  Factors influencing endoscopic estimation of colon polyp size in a colon model.

Authors:  Koen Robert Beukema; Jaimy A Simmering; Marjolein Brusse-Keizer; Sneha John; Rutger Quispel; Peter B Mensink
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-07-28

3.  Usefulness of a Colonoscopy Cap with an External Grid for the Measurement of Small-Sized Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Seul-Ki Han; Hyunil Kim; Jin-Woo Kim; Hyun-Soo Kim; Su-Young Kim; Hong-Jun Park
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  A structured light laser probe for gastrointestinal polyp size measurement: a preliminary comparative study.

Authors:  Marco Visentini-Scarzanella; Hiroshi Kawasaki; Ryo Furukawa; Marco Augusto Bonino; Simone Arolfo; Giacomo Lo Secco; Alberto Arezzo; Arianna Menciassi; Paolo Dario; Gastone Ciuti
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-05-08

5.  Post-polypectomy surveillance interval based on flexible spectral color imaging enhancement (FICE) with magnifying zoom imaging for optical biopsy.

Authors:  Rodrigo de Rezende Zago; Pedro Popoutchi; Lucas Santana Nova da Costa; Marcelo Averbach
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-08-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.