Literature DB >> 26381837

Distribution of independent components of binocular natural images.

David William Hunter, Paul B Hibbard.   

Abstract

An influential theory of the function of early processing in the visual cortex is that it forms an efficient coding of ecologically valid stimuli. In particular, correlations and differences between visual signals from the two eyes are believed to be of great importance in solving both depth from disparity and binocular fusion. Techniques such as independent-component analysis have been developed to learn efficient codings from natural images; these codings have been found to resemble receptive fields of simple cells in V1. However, the extent to which this approach provides an explanation of the functionality of the visual cortex is still an open question. We compared binocular independent components with physiological measurements and found a broad range of similarities along with a number of key differences. In common with physiological measurements, we found components with a broad range of both phase- and position-disparity tuning. However, we also found a larger population of binocularly anticorrelated components than have been found physiologically. We found components focused narrowly on detecting disparities proportional to half-integer multiples of wavelength rather than the range of disparities found physiologically. We present the results as a detailed analysis of phase and position disparities in Gabor-like components generated by independent-component analysis trained on binocular natural images and compare these results to physiology. We find strong similarities between components learned from natural images, indicating that ecologically valid stimuli are important in understanding cortical function, but with significant differences that suggest that our current models are incomplete.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26381837     DOI: 10.1167/15.13.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Emergence of Binocular Disparity Selectivity through Hebbian Learning.

Authors:  Tushar Chauhan; Timothée Masquelier; Alexandre Montlibert; Benoit R Cottereau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Determinants of neural responses to disparity in natural scenes.

Authors:  Yiran Duan; Alexandra Yakovleva; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Ideal Binocular Disparity Detectors Learned Using Independent Subspace Analysis on Binocular Natural Image Pairs.

Authors:  David W Hunter; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effect of image position on the Independent Components of natural binocular images.

Authors:  David W Hunter; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  "What Not" Detectors Help the Brain See in Depth.

Authors:  Nuno R Goncalves; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  A dataset of stereoscopic images and ground-truth disparity mimicking human fixations in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Andrea Canessa; Agostino Gibaldi; Manuela Chessa; Marco Fato; Fabio Solari; Silvio P Sabatini
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 6.444

7.  The Active Side of Stereopsis: Fixation Strategy and Adaptation to Natural Environments.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Andrea Canessa; Silvio P Sabatini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The upper disparity limit increases gradually with eccentricity.

Authors:  Saeideh Ghahghaei; Suzanne McKee; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.