Literature DB >> 26381196

Q-angle static or dynamic measurements, which is the best choice for patellofemoral pain?

Danilo de Oliveira Silva1, Ronaldo Valdir Briani1, Marcella Ferraz Pazzinatto1, Ana Valéria Gonçalves2, Deisi Ferrari3, Fernando Amâncio Aragão2, Fábio Mícolis de Azevedo4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The elevated Q-angle seems to be one of the most suggested factors contributing to patellofemoral pain. Females with patellofemoral pain are often evaluated through static clinical tests in clinical practice. However, the adaptations seem to appear more frequently in dynamic conditions. Performing static vs. dynamic evaluations of widely used measures would add to the knowledge in this area. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the reliability and discriminatory capability of three Q-angle measurements: a static clinical test, peak dynamic knee valgus during stair ascent and a static measurement using a three-dimensional system.
METHOD: Twenty-nine females with patellofemoral pain and twenty-five pain-free females underwent clinical Q-angle measurement and static and dynamic knee valgus measurements during stair ascent, using a three-dimensional system. All measurements were obtained and comparisons between groups, reliability and discriminatory capability were calculated.
FINDINGS: Peak dynamic knee valgus was found to be greater in the patellofemoral pain group. On the other hand, no significant effects were found for static knee valgus or clinical Q-angle measurements between groups. The dynamic variable demonstrated the best discriminatory capability. Low values of reliability were found for clinical Q-angle, in contrast to the high values found for the three-dimensional system measurements.
INTERPRETATION: Based on our findings, avoiding or correcting dynamic knee valgus during stair ascent may be an important component of rehabilitation programs in females with patellofemoral pain who demonstrate excessive dynamic knee valgus. Q-angle static measurements were not different between groups and presented poor values of discriminatory capability.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior knee pain; Kinematic; Lateral patellar maltracking; Patellofemoral joint; Quadriceps angle (Q-angle)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26381196     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  6 in total

1.  BIOMECHANICS AND PATHOMECHANICS OF THE PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT.

Authors:  Janice K Loudon
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

2.  The Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance Is Greater in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: Implications for the Origin of Pain and Clinical Interventions.

Authors:  Victor R Carlson; Barry P Boden; Aricia Shen; Jennifer N Jackson; Lawrence Yao; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Reliability of 2-Dimensional Video Analysis in Adolescent Runners.

Authors:  Yukiko Matsuzaki; Madison R Heath; Julianne M Khan; Alexandra T Mackie; Elad Spitzer; Peter D Fabricant
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2022-03-18

Review 4.  Clinical Significance of the Static and Dynamic Q-angle.

Authors:  Apostolos Z Skouras; Asimakis K Kanellopoulos; Sophia Stasi; Athanasios Triantafyllou; Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Georgios Papagiannis; George Papathanasiou
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-11

5.  Different pain responses to distinct levels of physical activity in women with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Ronaldo V Briani; Marcella F Pazzinatto; Danilo De Oliveira Silva; Fábio M Azevedo
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Clinical Measures of Pelvic Tilt in Physical Therapy.

Authors:  William H Suits
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-10-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.