| Literature DB >> 26380687 |
Muslihudeen A Abdul-Aziz1, Gerhard Schöfl2, Grit Mrotzek3, Haryanti Haryanti4, Ketut Sugama5, Hans Peter Saluz1.
Abstract
Here we used both microsatellites and mtCR (mitochondrial DNA control region) sequences as genetic markers to examine the genetic diversity and population structure of Penaeus monodon shrimp from six Indonesian regions. The microsatellite data showed that shrimp from the Indian and the Pacific Ocean were genetically distinct from each other. It has been reported previously that P. monodon mtCR sequences from the Indo-Pacific group into two major paralogous clades of unclear origin. Here we show that the population structure inferred from mtCR sequences matches the microsatellite-based population structure for one of these clades. This is consistent with the notion that this mtCR clade shares evolutionary history with nuclear DNA and may thus represent nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (Numts).Entities:
Keywords: Microsatellite; Numts; Penaeus monodon; mtCR; mtDNA; paralogous sequences
Year: 2015 PMID: 26380687 PMCID: PMC4567862 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Penaeus monodon (black tiger shrimp).
Figure 2Map indicating the six sample collection sites in Indonesian waters.
Fifteen polymorphic microsatellite loci which were used in the study (Pan et al. 2004)
| No. | Locus | GenBank accession no. | Primers | T. an. (C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PM528* | AY500855 | F: 5′-GTGTTATTTTCCACGGGTGC | 56 |
| R: 5′-GCTGCAGGAAGTGTAGGGAG | ||||
| 2 | PM580 | AY500856 | F: 5′-AACTGCCTACAGTGTGTGCG | 56 |
| R: 5′-GAATGGAGCCTGTTGGTTTG | ||||
| 3 | PM1091 | AY500857 | F: 5′-TTCACGACCCAGTATGTCCA | 50 |
| R: 5′-CAGGTCGCAGGCTCATATTT | ||||
| 4 | PM1713 | AY500858 | F: 5′-GTTGCGACGGGTTGATTC | 60 |
| R: 5′-TTTATGGCTATGGCTGACAC | ||||
| 5 | PM2345 | AY500860 | F: 5′-GATATTTCAAGGAATGCTCG | 56 |
| R: 5′-TAATTCGTGCCTTACCTCAT | ||||
| 6 | PM3852 | AY500862 | F: 5′-TAATGGGCGTAAGTCTTCGG | 56 |
| R: 5′-TGAAAGGAGTCGGGATATGC | ||||
| 7 | PM3854 | AY500863 | F: 5′-TCTTGGTCGGAATGGGTAAG | 56 |
| R: 5′-TTCTGAGAAGGCACACATGC | ||||
| 8 | PM3945 | AY500864 | F: 5′-TTTGGACTTCACAATCGGTG | 52 |
| R: 5′-CGGCTGAACAGGTCTGAAAT | ||||
| 9 | PM 4505* | AY500867 | F: 5′-CTTCTAGCGCCATTTCAAGG | 56 |
| R: 5′-TCCTTCCAGTGTTCGGAGTT | ||||
| 10 | PM4793 | AY500868 | F: 5′-CATTCACACACGTTCACCTG | 56 |
| R: 5′-CCCAGTTCACGTATCGTGTG | ||||
| 11 | PM4798 | AY500869 | GTGTGCATACTT | 52 |
| R: 5′-GTTCCCCTCGTGTTTACGAA | ||||
| 12 | PM4858* | AY500870 | F: 5′-GCCTTGTTACGGTGGAGGTA | 56 |
| R: 5′-CGGCCTATAACTGTCTGCCT | ||||
| 13 | PM4927* | AY500872 | F: 5′-GGGGAATTAATCTGCCCATT | 54 |
| R: 5′-AATGGCACAAGCAAAAGGAC | ||||
| 14 | PM5271* | AY500874 | F: 5′-AAAACACTCAGGGGAACACG | 53 |
| R: 5′-CGTGAGCCATAGCTGTAGCA | ||||
| 15 | PM5625* | AY500875 | F: 5′-AAAAGCCAGAGGAAACGTG | 52 |
| R: 5′-ACAGTGCACGTACCCACAAA |
Within-population genetic diversity per microsatellite loci across all six Penaeus monodon populations n, number of individuals genotyped; A, number of alleles; Ap, number of private alleles; Ar, allelic richness; HE, expected heterozygosity; Ho, observed heterozygosity; FIS, within-population genetic diversity
| Loci | PM 528 | PM 505 | PM 858 | PM 4927 | PM 5271 | PM 5625 | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allele range (bp) | 245–325 | 333–393 | 215–295 | 296–362 | 222–400 | 174–246 | |
| Sumbawa (17) | |||||||
| | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | |
| | 7 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 6.833333 |
| | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.833333 |
| | 3.22 | 3.143 | 2.595 | 3.198 | 3.655 | 2.963 | 3.129 |
| | 0.589 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −0.249 | 0.018 | −0.200 | 0.359 |
| | 0.812 | 0.714 | 0.630 | 0.801 | 0.848 | 0.714 | 0.753 |
| | 0.621 | 1 | 1 | −0.189 | 0.123 | −0.091 | 0.413 |
| Aceh(22) | |||||||
| | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | |
| | 9 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 13 | 5 | 7.833333 |
| | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1.166667 |
| | 3.318 | 2.797 | 2.916 | 3.066 | 3.581 | 2.96 | 3.106333 |
| | 0.404 | 0.870 | 0.897 | −0.194 | 0.552 | −0.193 | 0.389 |
| | 0.839 | 0.701 | 0.745 | 0.782 | 0.892 | 0.745 | 0.784 |
| | 0.438 | 0.884 | 0.906 | −0.15 | 0.577 | −0.113 | 0.427 |
| Timika (20) | |||||||
| | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 6.333333 |
| | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| | 2.618 | 3.132 | 2.857 | 2.833 | 3.43 | 3.2 | 3.011667 |
| | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.684 | −0.363 | 0.730 | −0.500 | 0.425 |
| | 0.677 | 0.778 | 0.729 | 0.734 | 0.855 | 0.677 | 0.741 |
| | 1 | 1 | 0.709 | −0.319 | 0.75 | −0.2 | 0.501 |
| Cilacap (9) | |||||||
| | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3.166667 |
| | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.333333 |
| | 2.8 | 4 | 2.404 | 3.089 | 2 | 1.952 | 2.7075 |
| | 1.000 | −0.500 | 1.000 | −0.122 | −2.000 | −1.250 | 0.312 |
| | 0.600 | 0.667 | 0.576 | 0.742 | 0.167 | 0.444 | 0.532 |
| | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0.27 |
| Grajagan (15) | |||||||
| | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| | 8 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4.333333 |
| | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| | 3.636 | 2 | 2.409 | 3.233 | 2.962 | 1.786 | 2.671 |
| | 0.607 | 1.000 | 0.348 | −0.324 | −0.161 | 1.000 | 0.411 |
| | 0.848 | 0.333 | 0.575 | 0.756 | 0.689 | 0.286 | 0.581 |
| | 0.667 | 1 | 0.432 | −0.176 | 0 | 1 | 0.479 |
| Bali (7) | |||||||
| | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 5.166667 |
| | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.5 |
| | 3.478 | 2.812 | 2.771 | 3 | 3.382 | 1.952 | 2.899167 |
| | 0.554 | 0.815 | 1.000 | −0.406 | −0.038 | −0.350 | 0.262 |
| | 0.842 | 0.675 | 0.697 | 0.711 | 0.803 | 0.444 | 0.695 |
| | 0.604 | 0.841 | 1 | −0.25 | 0.074 | −0.091 | 0.384 |
Pairwise FST among six populations by the use of six microsatellite loci
| Sumbawa | Aceh | Timika | Cilacap | Grajagan | Bali | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sumbawa | – | 0.043 | 0.087 | 0.115 | 0.052 | 0.068 |
| Aceh | – | – | 0.078 | 0.076 | 0.097 | 0.073 |
| Timika | – | – | – | 0.091 | 0.140 | 0.120 |
| Cilacap | – | – | – | – | 0.118 | 0.049 |
| Grajagan | – | – | – | – | – | 0.075 |
Figure 3Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from microsatellite FST values showing Penaeus monodon from six locations in the Indonesian waters clustered within three distinct clades.
Figure 4Bayesian analysis of microsatellite genotypes clustered Penaeus monodon samples from six locations in the Indonesian waters from three sources of genetic ancestry. Each vertical line pertains to an individual and the proportion of color per individual represents its likely genetic ancestry. Sumbawa, Bali, and Grajagan predominantly from a single source (orange) Timika almost exclusively from the two other sources (blue and pink), while individuals from Aceh and Cilacap showed admixture from all three genetic ancestral sources to varying degrees.
Figure 5Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from haplogroup A mtDNA control region FST values showing Penaeus monodon from six locations in the Indonesian waters clustered within four distinct clades.
Figure 6Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from haplogroup C mtDNA control region FST values showing Penaeus monodon from five locations in the Indonesian waters clustered within four distinct clades.
Figure 7Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from reduced haplogroup A data set microsatellite FST values showing Penaeus monodon from six locations in Indonesian waters clustered within three distinct clades.
Figure 8Bayesian analysis of microsatellite genotypes clustered Penaeus monodon samples from six locations in the Indonesian waters from three sources of genetic ancestry. Each vertical line pertains to an individual and the proportion of color per individual represents its likely genetic ancestry. Sumbawa, Bali, and Grajagan predominantly from a single source (orange) Timika almost exclusively from the two other sources (blue and pink), while individuals from Aceh and Cilacap showed admixture from all three genetic ancestral sources to varying degrees.
Figure 9Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from reduced haplogroup A data set mtDNA control region FST values showing Penaeus monodon from six locations in Indonesian waters clustered within four distinct clades.
Figure 10Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from reduced haplogroup C data set microsatellite FST values showing Penaeus monodon from five locations in the Indonesian waters clustered within three distinct clades.
Figure 11Bayesian analysis of microsatellite alleles from reduced data set from haplogroup C revealed no clear source of genetic ancestry.
Figure 12Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from reduced haplogroup C mtDNA control region FST values showing Penaeus monodon from five locations in Indonesian waters clustered within three distinct clades.