| Literature DB >> 26380682 |
Clare L Winton1, Yves Plante2, Pamela Hind2, Robert McMahon1, Matthew J Hegarty1, Neil R McEwan1, Mina C G Davies-Morel1, Charly M Morgan1, Wayne Powell3, Deborah M Nash1.
Abstract
Most species exist as subdivided ex situ daughter population(s) derived from a single original group of individuals. Such subdivision occurs for many reasons both natural and manmade. Traditional British and Irish pony breeds were introduced to North America (U.S.A. and Canada) within the last 150 years, and subsequently equivalent breed societies were established. We have analyzed selected U.K. and North American equivalent pony populations as a case study for understanding the relationship between putative source and derived subpopulations. Diversity was measured using mitochondrial DNA and a panel of microsatellite markers. Genetic signatures differed between the North American subpopulations according to historical management processes. Founder effect and stochastic drift was apparent, particularly pronounced in some breeds, with evidence of admixture of imported mares of different North American breeds. This demonstrates the importance of analysis of subpopulations to facilitate understanding the genetic effects of past management practices and to lead to informed future conservation strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Conservation; founder effect; horse; microsatellite; mtDNA; phylogenetics
Year: 2015 PMID: 26380682 PMCID: PMC4569044 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Timeline of breed export to North America (NA). Established British and Irish native breeds include the following: Welsh (sections A and B), Dartmoor (English), Fell (English), Highland (Scottish), Shetland (Scottish), Connemara (Irish), and Kerry Bog (Irish).
Summary statistics for mtDNA and SSR genotyping for each U.S. and U.K. pony population
| Population | mtDNA | AR | SSR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welsh Section A | 47 | 15 | 0.925 ± 016 | 0.0239 ± 0.0013 | 52 | 6.14 | 0.698 | 0.674 | 0.021 |
| Welsh Section B | 29 | 12 | 0.904 ± 0.028 | 0.0187 ± 0.0030 | 25 | 6.05 | 0.716 | 0.685 | 0.028 |
| U.S. Welsh Pony | 10 | 7 | 0.867 ± 0.107 | 0.0200 ± 0.0035 | 48 | 6.73 | 0.762 | 0.748 | 0.018 |
| Fell | 46 | 14 | 0.929 ± 0.014 | 0.0231 ± 0.0013 | 46 | 6.73 | 0.738 | 0.73 | 0.003 |
| U.S. Fell | 9 | 2 | 0.222 ± 0.166 | 0.0042 ± 0.003 | 25 | 5.25 | 0.683 | 0.641 | 0.055 |
| Highland | 46 | 15 | 0.916 ± 0.017 | 0.0178 ± 0.0012 | 40 | 5.93 | 0.707 | 0.722 | −0.045 |
| U.S. Highland | 11 | 6 | 0.836 ± 0.089 | 0.0233 ± 0.0030 | 25 | 4.76 | 0.657 | 0.658 | −0.006 |
| Connemara | 46 | 18 | 0.882 ± 0.032 | 0.0192 ± 0.0019 | 47 | 5.90 | 0.743 | 0.73 | 0.010 |
| U.S. Connemara | 12 | 6 | 0.818 ± 0.096 | 0.0243 ± 0.0040 | 37 | 5.93 | 0.751 | 0.778 | −0.037 |
| Dartmoor | 40 | 10 | 0.814 ± 0.037 | 0.0122 ± 0.0020 | 39 | 6.08 | 0.694 | 0.685 | 0.003 |
| U.S. Dartmoor | 12 | 3 | 0.439 ± 0.158 | 0.0114 ± 0.0039 | 25 | 4.97 | 0.639 | 0.609 | 0.042 |
| Shetland | 39 | 8 | 0.767 ± 0.054 | 0.0225 ± 0.0026 | 35 | 5.60 | 0.664 | 0.657 | 0.005 |
| U.S. Shetland | 14 | 6 | 0.835 ± 0.057 | 0.0220 ± 0.0026 | 28 | 5.18 | 0.643 | 0.614 | 0.045 |
| Kerry Bog Pony | 39 | 17 | 0.934 ± 0.020 | 0.0210 ± 0.0017 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| U.S. Kerry Bog Pony | 10 | 5 | 0.800 ± 0.100 | 0.0151 ± 0.0028 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
N, sample number; H, number of mtDNA haplotypes; h, mtDNA haplotype diversity; π, mtDNA nucleotide diversity; SD, standard deviation; AR, allelic richness based upon a minimum sample size of 23 individuals; He, expected heterozygosity; Ho, observed heterozygosity; and FIS, inbreeding coefficient.
Figure 2The results of STRUCTURE analysis for 10 SSR loci of each population for (A) K = 2 and (B) K = 4, averaged over six independent runs. STRUCTURE Harvester analysis suggests true value of K was 2 and 4.
Pairwise FST comparisons based on sum of squared size differences (RST) and effective number of migrants for U.S. and U.K. pony populations
| Welsh Sect. A | Welsh Sect. B | U.S. Welsh | Fell | U.S. Fell | High. | U.S. High. | Conn. | U.S. Conn. | Dart. | U.S. Dart. | Shet. | U.S. Shet. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welsh Sect. A | 1.87 | 15.84 | 44.76 | 9.2 | 1.765 | 2.6 | 3.045 | 4.09 | 8.47 | 3.02 | 3.315 | 4.745 | 7.41 |
| Welsh Sect. B | 0.016 | 1.96 | 12.01 | 10.58 | 1.655 | 2.36 | 2.02 | 8.13 | 11.215 | 6.775 | 5.31 | 5.355 | 6.29 |
| U.S. Welsh | 0.006 | 0.02 | 2.25 | 0.037 | 1.505 | 0.099 | 3.05 | 0.069 | 0.038 | 0.101 | 3.15 | 0.077 | 4.8 |
| Fell | 0.026 | 0.023 | 6.535 | 2.08 | 13.26 | 5.755 | 13.9 | 7.68 | 11.82 | 3.83 | 4.29 | 3.29 | 3.34 |
| U.S. Fell | 0.124 | 0.131 | 0.142 | 0.019 | 1.81 | 0.081 | 3.67 | 0.089 | 0.081 | 0.139 | 1.13 | 0.153 | 1.195 |
| High. | 0.088 | 0.096 | 2.28 | 0.042 | 2.825 | 1.92 | 20.07 | 4.74 | 3.865 | 3.42 | 1.49 | 1.37 | 1.19 |
| U.S. High. | 0.076 | 0.11 | 0.076 | 0.018 | 0.064 | 0.012 | 1.72 | 0.069 | 0.056 | 0.119 | 0.17 | 0.157 | 1.46 |
| Conn. | 0.058 | 0.03 | 3.375 | 0.032 | 2.565 | 0.05 | 3.395 | 2.12 | 105.32 | 10.64 | 1.7 | 3.71 | 2.515 |
| U.S. Conn. | 0.029 | 0.022 | 6.27 | 0.021 | 2.855 | 0.061 | 4.255 | 0.002 | 2.18 | 0.028 | 2.46 | 0.044 | 4.725 |
| Dart. | 0.076 | 0.036 | 7.235 | 0.061 | 1.55 | 0.068 | 1.85 | 0.023 | 8.565 | 1.85 | 2.44 | 3.17 | 2.16 |
| U.S. Dart. | 0.07 | 0.045 | 0.074 | 0.055 | 0.181 | 0.144 | 1.225 | 0.128 | 0.092 | 0.093 | 1.67 | 0.152 | 1.725 |
| Shet. | 0.05 | 0.045 | 3.005 | 0.071 | 1.39 | 0.155 | 1.345 | 0.063 | 5.485 | 0.073 | 1.4 | 1.74 | 14.28 |
| U.S. Shet. | 0.033 | 0.038 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.173 | 0.173 | 0.146 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.104 | 0.127 | 0.017 | 1.68 |
Below diagonal: Pairwise FST based on sum of squared size differences (RST). Above diagonal: effective number of migrants (Nm) per generation, based on Slatkin, 1995. Diagonal elements: Theta H estimates 4Neμ = (1/(1−He)2)−1. Abbreviated populations are defined as follows: Welsh Section A, Welsh Sect. A; Welsh Section B, Welsh Sect. B; U.S. Welsh Pony, U.S. Welsh U.S.; Highland, High.; U.S. Highland, U.S. High.; Connemara, Conn.; U.S. Connemara, U.S. Conn.; Dartmoor, Dart.; U.S. Dartmoor, U.S. Dart.; Shetland, Shet.; U.S. Shetland, U.S. Shet. All values are significantly different (P < 0.05) with the exception of those in cells shaded grey.
MtDNA population average pairwise differences, within-population pairwise differences and estimated effective number of migrants
Figure 3A median-joining network for mtDNA haplotypes displaying the relationships of the maternal lines of the British, Irish, and U.S. pony populations according to shared mitochondrial haplotype frequencies. Node size represents overall haplotype frequency with pie charts within nodes showing frequency of that haplotype by population. Reference samples representing examples of each of the major haplogroups identified by (Achilli et al. 2012) are displayed in black and labeled according to sample number and haplogroup, for example, “1HapA” Numerical values indicate the number of nucleotide changes (>1 mutation) between primary nodes. The haplotype designated as A40 is placed most ancestrally relative to the entire dataset and contains ancestral samples.
Figure 4Haplogroup frequency (%) according to breed. Segments represent proportion of individuals belonging to labeled haplogroup. The first row identifiers “A” to “Q” represent the major worldwide mtDNA haplogroups in horses: haplogroup classification is based upon control region motifs, as described by (Achilli et al. 2012).
Figure 5Extended Bayesian Skyline plots of estimated past population dynamics by Bayesian Monte Carlo simulation of coalescent molecular trees based on mitochondrial DNA data. The y-axis indicates the effective relative number of females, while the x-axis is years (×106) before present. The plot lines are as follows: red, median estimate; blue, mean estimate; green, lower 95% limits; and purple, upper 95% limits. Note differing axis assigned to U.S. Welsh pony.
| U.K. and Irish samples | North American samples | Kerry Bog samples | Ancient horse samples | Haplogroup identifier samples | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSR data | Original data generated for the current study and Winton et al. ( | Prystupa et al. ( | NA | NA | NA |
| MtDNA data | Original data generated for the current, study, accession numbers KR361761–KR362244, and Winton et al. ( | Prystupa et al. ( | McGahern et al. ( | Cieslak et al. ( | Achilli et al. ( |
| Population | Harpending's raggedness index | |
|---|---|---|
| Welsh Section A | 0.0576 | |
| Welsh Section B | 0.0423 | 0.64 |
| U.S. Welsh Pony | 0.0790 | 0.54 |
| Fell | 0.0179 | 0.42 |
| U.S. Fell | 0.7037 | 0.72 |
| Highland | 0.0547 | 0.13 |
| U.S. Highland | 0.1867 | 0.11 |
| Connemara | 0.0218 | 0.74 |
| U.S. Connemara | 0.1782 | |
| Dartmoor | 0.0591 | 0.63 |
| U.S. Dartmoor | 0.4277 | 0.98 |
| Shetland | 0.1095 | |
| U.S. Shetland | 0.3075 | |
| Kerry Bog Pony | 0.0264 | 0.24 |
| U.S. Kerry Bog Pony | 0.1753 | 0.09 |