Hope M Tiesman1, Rebecca J Heick2, Srinivas Konda1, Scott Hendricks1. 1. Division of Safety Research - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. 2. MCPHS Online, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Motor-vehicle-related events (MVEs) are the leading cause of on-duty death for law enforcement officers, yet little is known about how officers view this significant job hazard. The purpose of this paper is to explore officers' motor-vehicle risk perception and examine how prior on-duty MVEs and the death or injury of a fellow officer influences this perception. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A state-wide random sample of 136 law enforcement agencies was drawn using publically accessible databases, stratified on type and size of agency. In total, 60 agencies agreed to participate and a cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed to 1,466 officers. Using six-point Likert scales, composite scores for motor-vehicle and intentional violence risk perception were derived. A linear regression multivariable model was used to examine factors affecting motor-vehicle risk perception. FINDINGS: Motor-vehicle risk perception scores were significantly higher than intentional violence scores. A prior on-duty motor-vehicle crash, prior roadside incident, or knowledge of fellow officer's injury or death from a MVE significantly increased motor-vehicle risk perception scores. After controlling for potential confounders though, only prior on-duty crashes and roadside incidents impacted motor-vehicle risk perception. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The study comprised primarily small, rural agencies and generalizability may be limited. Also, although the data were collected anonymously, reporting and response biases may affect these findings. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study involved a large and diverse cohort of officers and explored motor-vehicle risk perception. A better understanding of officers' risk perceptions will assist in the development and implementation of occupational injury prevention programs, training, and policy.
PURPOSE: Motor-vehicle-related events (MVEs) are the leading cause of on-duty death for law enforcement officers, yet little is known about how officers view this significant job hazard. The purpose of this paper is to explore officers' motor-vehicle risk perception and examine how prior on-duty MVEs and the death or injury of a fellow officer influences this perception. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A state-wide random sample of 136 law enforcement agencies was drawn using publically accessible databases, stratified on type and size of agency. In total, 60 agencies agreed to participate and a cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed to 1,466 officers. Using six-point Likert scales, composite scores for motor-vehicle and intentional violence risk perception were derived. A linear regression multivariable model was used to examine factors affecting motor-vehicle risk perception. FINDINGS: Motor-vehicle risk perception scores were significantly higher than intentional violence scores. A prior on-duty motor-vehicle crash, prior roadside incident, or knowledge of fellow officer's injury or death from a MVE significantly increased motor-vehicle risk perception scores. After controlling for potential confounders though, only prior on-duty crashes and roadside incidents impacted motor-vehicle risk perception. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The study comprised primarily small, rural agencies and generalizability may be limited. Also, although the data were collected anonymously, reporting and response biases may affect these findings. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study involved a large and diverse cohort of officers and explored motor-vehicle risk perception. A better understanding of officers' risk perceptions will assist in the development and implementation of occupational injury prevention programs, training, and policy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Law enforcement; Motor-vehicle crash; Occupational injury; Risk perception
Authors: John M Violanti; Desta Fekedulegn; Michael E Andrew; Luenda E Charles; Tara A Hartley; Bryan Vila; Cecil M Burchfiel Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Matthew M Clark; Beth A Warren; Philip T Hagen; Bruce D Johnson; Sarah M Jenkins; Brooke L Werneburg; Kerry D Olsen Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2011 Sep-Oct
Authors: Craig Bennell; Bryce Jenkins; Brittany Blaskovits; Tori Semple; Ariane-Jade Khanizadeh; Andrew Steven Brown; Natalie Jennifer Jones Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-03-07