| Literature DB >> 26379678 |
Cattarin Theerawitaya1, Rujira Tisarum1, Thapanee Samphumphuang1, Harminder P Singh2, Chalermpol Kirdmanee1, Teruhiro Takabe3.
Abstract
Acacia ampliceps (salt wattle), a leguminous shrub, has been introduced in salt-affected areas in the northeast of Thailand for the remediation of saline soils. However, the defense mechanisms underlying salt tolerance A. ampliceps are unknown. We investigated various physio-biochemical and morphological attributes of A. ampliceps in response to varying levels of salt treatment (200-600 mM NaCl). Seedlings of A. ampliceps (25 ± 2 cm in plant height) raised from seeds were treated with 200 mM (mild stress), 400 and 600 mM (extreme stress) of salt treatment (NaCl) under greenhouse conditions. Na(+) and Ca(2+) contents in the leaf tissues increased significantly under salt treatment, whereas K(+) content declined in salt-stressed plants. Free proline and soluble sugar contents in plants grown under extreme salt stress (600 mM NaCl) for 9 days significantly increased by 28.7 (53.33 μmol g(-1) FW) and 3.2 (42.11 mg g(-1) DW) folds, respectively over the control, thereby playing a major role as osmotic adjustment. Na(+) enrichment in the phyllode tissues of salt-stressed seedlings positively related to total chlorophyll (TC) degradation (R (2) = 0.72). Photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll fluorescence in salt-stressed plants increased under mild salt stress (200 mM NaCl). However, these declined under high levels of salinity (400-600 mM NaCl), consequently resulting in a reduced net photosynthetic rate (R (2) = 0.81) and plant dry weight (R (2) = 0.91). The study concludes that A. ampliceps has an osmotic adjustment and Na(+) compartmentation as effective salt defense mechanisms, and thus it could be an excellent species to grow in salt-affected soils.Entities:
Keywords: Na+/K+ ratio; free proline; halophytic species; net photosynthetic rate; osmotic adjustment; soluble sugar
Year: 2015 PMID: 26379678 PMCID: PMC4553901 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Plant morphological characters of .
Shoot height (SH), root length (RL), number of phyllodes (NL), number of roots (NR), shoot fresh weight (SHFW), and root fresh weight (RTFW) of .
| 0 | 33.1 ± 1.87ab | 14.1 ± 1.83ab | 6.4 ± 0.60ab | 20.0 ± 1.76ab | 5.47 ± 0.12a | 263 ± 3.4b |
| 200 | 36.7 ± 1.58a | 16.3 ± 1.42a | 9.4 ± 1.12a | 29.8 ± 1.66a | 6.59 ± 0.21a | 543 ± 3.9a |
| 400 | 29.6 ± 0.77ab | 13.3 ± 0.82ab | 4.0 ± 0.32b | 20.0 ± 2.11ab | 2.45 ± 0.25b | 185 ± 2.5c |
| 600 | 27.5 ± 1.25b | 12.5 ± 1.23b | 3.8 ± 0.37b | 16.4 ± 2.35b | 1.45 ± 0.31b | 139 ± 1.2c |
Data presented as mean ± SE. Different letters in each column are significantly different at p ≤ 0.01 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
FIGURE 2Fresh weight (A), dry weight (B), phyllode leaf area (C), and net photosynthetic rate (D) of Data presented as mean ± SE. Different letters represent significant difference at p ≤ 0.01 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
FIGURE 3Na Data presented as mean ± SE. Different letters represent significant difference at p ≤ 0.01 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
FIGURE 4Free proline (A) and total soluble sugar (B) content of Data presented as mean ± SE. Different letters represent significant difference at p ≤ 0.01 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Sucrose (Suc), glucose (Gluc), fructose (Fruc), stomatal conductance (g.
| 0 | 6.61 ± 0.13c | 3.94 ± 0.12c | 2.55 ± 0.21c | 5.51 ± 0.13b | 1.63 ± 0.12b |
| 200 | 7.79 ± 0.08bc | 9.04 ± 0.41b | 9.15 ± 0.30b | 10.44 ± 0.56a | 3.13 ± 0.14a |
| 400 | 9.42 ± 0.15b | 12.51 ± 0.59a | 12.78 ± 0.20a | 3.98 ± 0.13b | 1.41 ± 0.18b |
| 600 | 14.37 ± 0.62a | 14.73 ± 0.79a | 13.01 ± 0.23a | 2.79 ± 0.12b | 0.83 ± 0.08b |
Data presented as mean ± SE. Different letters in each column are significantly different at p ≤ 0.01 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
Chlorophyll a (Chl.
| 0 | 59.15 ± 1.95b | 70.05 ± 2.15ab | 129.19 ± 4.43b | 0.871 ± 0.005a | 0.788 ± 0.012a |
| 200 | 95.98 ± 6.63a | 82.67 ± 3.87a | 178.65 ± 5.56a | 0.873 ± 0.003a | 0.793 ± 0.012a |
| 400 | 52.71 ± 0.50b | 69.14 ± 1.90ab | 121.85 ± 3.44b | 0.788 ± 0.003b | 0.715 ± 0.007b |
| 600 | 49.64 ± 0.42b | 57.99 ± 1.42b | 107.62 ± 1.75b | 0.725 ± 0.001c | 0.686 ± 0.021c |
Data presented as mean ± SE, Different letters in each column are significantly different at p ≤ 0.01 according to Tukey’s HSD test.
FIGURE 5Relationships between (A) Na Error bars represent ± SE.