| Literature DB >> 26379353 |
Navid Omidifar1, Bita Geramizadeh2, Mitra Mirzai3.
Abstract
There are very few studies about K-ras mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) from developing countries such as Iran. It is therefore essential to conduct studies to learn about the molecular signature of such tumors, allowing the determination of an appropriate management plan. In the present study, we aimed to determine the frequency and types of K-ras mutations among patients with CRC in Iran. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of 100 cases of CRC were collected from hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (June 2011 to June 2013). All of the H&E slides were examined and proper slide with a minimum of necrosis and maximum of well-preserved tumor cells (at least 70% tumor in each slide) were selected. Recurrent, metastatic, and post chemotherapy cases were excluded from the study. Mutation of codons 12 and 13 of K-ras gene by PCR was performed, followed by direct sequencing by Sanger method. From 100 eligible cases (55 male and 45 females with mean age of 59 years), 32% had mutant K-ras gene; the most common substitution was 12G>C followed by 12G>A and 13G>A, respectively. It is found that K-ras mutation rate, among the selected population of the southern province of Iran, was as high as 32% (codon 12: 71.8% and in codon 13: 25% and one in both codons: 3.1%).Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Frequency; Iran; K-ras
Year: 2015 PMID: 26379353 PMCID: PMC4567606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Med Sci ISSN: 0253-0716
Figure 1The picture shows K-ras gel electrophoresis 1. First Left: Positive control, K-ras codon 13 positive G12C/+ (GGT→TGT), 2. Second left: Cell line control, K-ras codon 13 positive G13N/+ (GGC→AAC), 3. First right: Patient sample.
Figure 2The figure shows DNA sequencing of mutation in codon 13 (with 2G to C substitution GGC→AAC).
Frequency of different types of K-ras mutations in the current study
| Type of substitution | Frequency (%) | Amino acid |
|---|---|---|
| Normal | ||
| (12GGT) | 68 | 12 Glycine (Gly/G) |
| (13GGC) | 13 Alanine (Ala/A) | |
| 12GCT | 12 | Alanine (Ala/A) |
| 12GAT | 9 | Aspartic acid (Asp/D) |
| 12AGT | 1 | Serine (Ser/S) |
| 12TGT | 1 | Cysteine (Cys/C) |
| 12GCT,13GAC | 1 | Ala, Asp |
| 13GAC | 6 | Asp |
| 13AGC | 1 | Ser |
| 13CGC | 1 | Arginine (Arg/R) |
| Total | 100 | - |
Comparison of different studies about K-ras gene status in CRC all around the world
| Study | Year | Method | Sample size | Mutation prevalence (%) | Most common substitution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iraq[ | 2012 | PCRReverse hybridization to oligospecific probes | 50 | 48 | 12G>T |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| Saudi Arabia[ | 2011 | PCRsequencing | 46 | 32 | 12G>A |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| Turkey[ | 2013 | Codon 12, 13 | 145 | 37.9 | - |
| Jordan[ | 2012 | RTPCRbased assay Sanger sequencing | 100 | 44 | 12G>A |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| India[ | 2009 | PCRsequencing | 53 | 22.64 | 12G>A |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| Japan[ | 2000 | PCRsequencing | 18 | 50 | 12G>T |
| Only Codon 12 | |||||
| Thailand[ | 2013 | PCRsequencing | 200 | 23 | 12G>A |
| codon 12, 13 and 61 | |||||
| China[ | 2010 | PCRsequencing | 101 | 32.7 | 12G>A |
| codon 12, 13, 61 | |||||
| Korea[ | 2010 | PCRsequencing | 92 | 28.3 | 12G>A |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| Italy[ | 2011 | PCRsequencing (fluorescencebased) | 478 | 30 | 12G>A |
| Codon12, 13, 61 | |||||
| UK[ | 2013 | PCRsequencing | 69 | 49.3 (46.4) | 12G>A |
| Codon12, 13, 61 | |||||
| Germany[ | 2009 | PCRsequencing | 1018 | 39.3 | 12G>A |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| Slovenia[ | 2010 | RTPCR | 302 | 45.5 | 12G>A |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| USA[ | 2013 | PCRsequencing | 171 | 31.6 | 12G>T |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| Australia[ | 2013 | PCRsequencing | 776 | 28 | - |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| Tunisia[ | 2012 | PCR sequencing | 52 | 23.07 | - |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| Moroco[ | 2010 | PCRmelting and direct sequencing | 62 | 29 | - |
| Codon 12, 13 | |||||
| Current study | 2013 | PCRsequencing | 100 | 32 | 12G>C |
Comparison of different studies about K-ras gene status in CRC in different parts of Iran
| Study | Year | Method | Sample size | Mutation prevalence (%) | Most common substitution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shemirani et al.[ | 2011 | Codon 1213 | 48 CRC | 12.5 | 12G→A (GGT>GAT) |
| PCRsequencing | (Gly→Asp) | ||||
| Sobhani et al.[ | 2010 | Codon 1213 | 59 | 20.3 | 12G→A (GGT>GAT) |
| PCRsequencing | (Gly→Asp) | ||||
| Bishehsari et al.[ | 2006 | Codon12, 13, 61 | 182 | 37.4 | 12G→A (GGT>GAT) |
| PCRsequencing | (Gly→Asp) | ||||
| Current study | 2013 | PCRsequencing | 100 | 32 | 12G>C |
| PCR primers: | ||
| GCTGAAAATGACTG | Forward | 113 bp |
| AATATAAACTTGT | ||
| TTGTTGGATCATATTCGTCCAC | Reverse | |
| Sequencing primer:1 | ||
| TGGATCATATTCGTCCACAA | Reverse |