Literature DB >> 26379081

Expectancy biases in fear and anxiety and their link to biases in attention.

Tatjana Aue1, Hadas Okon-Singer2.   

Abstract

Healthy individuals often exhibit prioritized processing of aversive information, as manifested in enhanced orientation of attention to threatening stimuli compared with neutral items. In contrast to this adaptive behavior, anxious, fearful, and phobic individuals show exaggerated attention biases to threat. In addition, they overestimate the likelihood of encountering their feared stimulus and the severity of the consequences; both are examples of expectancy biases. The co-occurrence of attention and expectancy biases in fear and anxiety raises the question about causal influences. Herein, we summarize findings related to expectancy biases in fear and anxiety, and their association with attention biases. We suggest that evidence calls for more comprehensive research strategies in the investigation of mutual influences between expectancy and attention biases, as well as their combined effects on fear and anxiety. Moreover, both types of bias need to be related to other types of distorted information processing commonly observed in fear and anxiety (e.g., memory and interpretation biases). Finally, we propose new research directions that may be worth considering in developing more effective treatments for anxiety disorders.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Attention bias; Combined bias hypothesis; Expectancy bias; Fear; Phobia; Threat

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26379081     DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0272-7358


  20 in total

1.  Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.

Authors:  Tamara P Tavares; Kyle Logie; Derek G V Mitchell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The influence of subcortical shortcuts on disordered sensory and cognitive processing.

Authors:  Jessica McFadyen; Raymond J Dolan; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Dispositional negativity, cognition, and anxiety disorders: An integrative translational neuroscience framework.

Authors:  Juyoen Hur; Melissa D Stockbridge; Andrew S Fox; Alexander J Shackman
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 4.  Application of Cognitive Bias Testing in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Mini-Review Based on Animal Studies.

Authors:  Yu-Han Zhang; Ning Wang; Xiao-Xiao Lin; Jin-Yan Wang; Fei Luo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Effect of Acute Aerobic Exercise on Ocular Measures of Attention to Emotionally Expressive Faces.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Thom; Mark J Campbell; Colby Reyes; Matthew P Herring
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2021-06

6.  Identifying Psychological Perceptions of People Ignoring the Novel COVID-19 Warnings: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis in Isfahan, Iran.

Authors:  Mehdi Nosratabadi; Zohreh Halvaiepour
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2021-03-16

7.  Nothing is safe: Intolerance of uncertainty is associated with compromised fear extinction learning.

Authors:  Jayne Morriss; Anastasia Christakou; Carien M van Reekum
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Seeing through rose-colored glasses: How optimistic expectancies guide visual attention.

Authors:  Laura Kress; Mirko Bristle; Tatjana Aue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The neurobiology of dispositional negativity and attentional biases to threat: Implications for understanding anxiety disorders in adults and youth.

Authors:  Alexander J Shackman; Melissa D Stockbridge; Rachael M Tillman; Claire M Kaplan; Do P M Tromp; Andrew S Fox; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  J Exp Psychopathol       Date:  2016

10.  Itsy bitsy spider?: Valence and self-relevance predict size estimation.

Authors:  Tali Leibovich; Noga Cohen; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.