| Literature DB >> 26378520 |
Hai-Zhong Yu1, De-Fu Wen2, Wan-Lin Wang3, Lei Geng4, Yan Zhang5, Jia-Ping Xu6.
Abstract
The rice leaf roller (Entities:
Keywords: Cnaphalocrocis medinalis; chitin metabolism; insecticide detoxification; insecticide target; transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26378520 PMCID: PMC4613286 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160921873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Functional annotation of the C. medinalis transcriptome.
| Annotated Databases | Annotated Number | 300 ≤ Length < 1000 bp | Length ≥ 1000 bp |
|---|---|---|---|
| COG_Annotation | 8669 | 3410 | 4372 |
| GO_Annotation | 18,176 | 7955 | 7174 |
| KEGG_Annotation | 10,043 | 4217 | 4482 |
| Swissprot_Annotation | 24,246 | 10,627 | 10,539 |
| nr_Annotation | 31,810 | 14,722 | 11,261 |
| All_Annotated | 32,035 | 14,834 | 11,270 |
Summary of simple sequence repeat (SSR) types in the C. medinalis transcriptome.
| Repeat Motif | Number | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Single-nucleotide | ||
| A/T | 4803 | |
| C/G | 247 | |
| Total | 5050 | 48.59 |
| Di-nucleotide | ||
| AC/GT | 372 | |
| AG/CT | 775 | |
| AT/AT | 535 | |
| CG/CG | 144 | |
| Total | 1826 | 17.57 |
| Tri-nucleotide | ||
| AAC/GTT/AAG/CTT/AAT/ATT | 757 | |
| ACC/GGT/ACG/CGT/ACT/AGT | 800 | |
| AGC/CTG/AGG/CCT/ATC/ATG/CCG/CGG | 1851 | |
| Total | 3408 | 36.60 |
| Tetra-nucleotide | ||
| AAAC/GTTT/AAAG/CTTT/AAAT/ATTT/AACC/GGTT | 54 | |
| AACG/CGTT/AAGC/CTTG/AAGG/CCTT/AATC/ATTG | 11 | |
| AATG/ATTC/ACAG/CTGT/ACAT/ATGT/ACCG/CGGT | 13 | |
| ACCT/AGGT/ACGC/CGTG/ACGG/CCGT/ACTC/AGTG | 10 | |
| ACTG/AGTC/AGAAGCG/CGCTT/ATCT/AGCC/CTGG/ | 6 | |
| AGGC/CCTG/AGGG/CCCT/ATCC/ATCG/ATCG/ATCG | 7 | |
| Total | 101 | 0.97 |
| Penta-nucleotide | ||
| AAAAC/GTTTT/AAAAT/ATTTT | 3 | |
| AAGTG/ACTTC/AATTC/AATTG | 2 | |
| AGGCG/CCTCG | 1 | |
| Total | 6 | 0.058 |
| Hexa- nucleotide | ||
| ACCATG/ATGGTC | 1 | |
| ACCGCC/CGGTGG | 1 | |
| AGCCGC/CGGCTG | 1 | |
| Total | 3 | 0.029 |
The A/T/C/G motifs were the most abundant repeat type, and accounted for approximately half of the total number of SSRs. In previous research, 20 microsatellite markers were isolated and characterized from C. medinalis using the method of fast isolation by Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) of sequence containing repeats. According to our transcriptome sequencing databases, we obtained a large number of SSRs. The result would facilitate the future study on population genetics and molecular genetics of C. medinalis and would also be useful for species taxonomy study considering the migratory character of C. medinalis.
Figure 1Characteristics of homology search of Illumina sequences against the non-redundant (nr) database. (A) Species distribution is shown as the percentage of the total homologous sequences (with an E-value ≤1.0 × 10−5); (B) E-value distribution of BLAST hits for each unique sequence with a cut-off E-value of 1.0 × 10−5. We used all insect proteins in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nr database for homology search and extracted the best hit of each sequence for analysis.
Figure 2Functional annotation of assembled sequences based on gene ontology (GO) categorization. GO analysis was performed at the level two for three main categories (cellular component, molecular function, and biological process).
Figure 3Clusters of orthologous group (COG) classification. A total of 8669 unigenes with non-redundant database hits were grouped into 25 COG classifications.
Primers used in sequencing the full-length cDNA and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis.
| Gene Name | Primer Sequence | Length of Product (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| F: CTGGAACAGCAACGGAAACT | 190 | |
| R: TCCGTTGTTGATGAGCCAGA | ||
| F: TGCTGGCAACAACAACTACAATC | 231 | |
| R: ATCTCCACGCTCTTAGGGTCTT | ||
| F: AAGAAATGGCGGGTATGAGGGTG | 142 | |
| R: AGTGGTGGATTAGACAAAGGTGCG | ||
| F: GAGCGTGGTTACTCATTCA | 283 | |
| R: TGTCAACATCGCACTTCA | ||
| F: TTGATGCGGATGTTGACG | 164 | |
| R: ATGCCCTTTGGAGTTGGA | ||
| F: AACTGTATTCGGCTTTATCC | 234 | |
| R: ACACACTTGCTGCCTTTTCC | ||
| F1: GTCTACGGTTGCGTTGCTCC | 911 | |
| R1: GAGCAACGCAACCGTAGACGACTGG | ||
| F2: CATCATCGTTGTGCGTGACAGAGTG | 970 | |
| R2: ACGACAGCACAATCACCGCACCTT | ||
| F3: GCCGTCCTCGGAGCAGAAACAGTCA | 830 | |
| R3: CCAACAACGA CGAATATCTTCCAGG | ||
| F1: TGTCCTCGATGCCGTACCTGCCCAC | 1300 | |
| R1: AAGGGGTGCTGACCGCTGCTGTGCCGCT | ||
| F2: CACGCCGGGGCGGTACACCGCC | 300 | |
| R2: TGGGAAGACAAGGGCTGTCCAACCAACA | ||
| F1: ACTATGTGGCACGAAACGAA | 354 | |
| R1: TAGTACATGTACAT | ||
| F2: CATTTGAAAGATAAGGC | 580 | |
| R2: ACCAACATRAGRAADAT | ||
| F3: CGCCTTACATCGCTTACC | 1258 | |
| R3: ACBARACCRATNGGYTCC | ||
The major enzyme genes involved in chitin metabolism in C. medinalis.
| Gene Name | GeneBank Accession No | Length (bp) | Function (Ontology) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chitin synthase 1 (CHS1) | KP000843 | 4868 | chitin biosynthetic process |
| Chitin synthase 2 (CHS2) | KP000844 | 4651 | |
| KP000845 | 1934 | carbohydrate metabolic process phosphoacetylglucosamine mutase activity, UDP- | |
| UDP- | KP000846 | 1173 (partial) | transferase activity, transferring glycosyl groups, UMP salvage catalytic activity |
| KP000849 | 733 (partial) | ||
| Chitinase 1 | KF897513 | 2039 | chitin catabolic process, carbohydrate metabolic process, chitinase activity chitin binding, carbohydrate metabolic process, extracellular region, cuticle chitin catabolic process, chitinase activity chitin catabolic process, carbohydrate metabolic process, imaginal disc development, extracellular region, chitinase activity chitin catabolic process, carbohydrate metabolic process, chitinase activity β- |
| Chitinase 2 | KP000847 | 1897 | |
| Chitinase 3 | KP000848 | 4311 | |
| Chitinase 5 | KP000850 | 2105 (partial) | |
| Chitinase 7 | none | none | |
| β- | KP000851 | 1377 (partial) | |
| Chitin deacetylase 1 | KP000854 | 2020 | |
| Chitin deacetylase 2 | KP000852 | 2158 | |
| Chitin deacetylase 4 | KP000853 | 1537 | |
| Chitin deacetylase 5 | 1768147 | 765 (partial) | |
| Chitin deacetylase 6 | 1787955 | 349 (partial) |
Figure 4Phylogenetic relationships of chitin-related enzymes deduced from the open reading frame (ORF) among C. medinalis and other insect species. The tree was constructed from the multiple alignments using MEGA 6.0 program (1000 bootstrap replications). Bootstrap values >50% are shown. The C. medinalis enzymes are indicated by red, green or pink markers. Cm, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis; Bm, Bombyx mori; Of, Ostrinia furnacalis; Px, Plutella xylostella; Se, Spodoptera exiqua; Eo, Ectropis oblique; Ms, Manduca sexta; Ag, Anopheles gambiae; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Bd, Bactrocera dorsalis; Tc, Tribolium castaneum; Mb, Mamestra brassicae; Dp, Danaus plexippus; Cf, Choristoneura fumiferana; Nv, Nasonia vitripennis; Md, Microplitis demolitor; Px, Papilio xuthus; Pp, Papilio polytes.
Figure 5Real-time PCR analysis of the transcripts putatively encoding chitin metabolism enzymes and detoxification-related enzymes in C. medinalis. (A to E refer to relative expression level of C. medinalis chitin synthase 1 (CmCHS1), chitinase 1 (CmCHT1), chitin deacetylase 1 (CmCDA1), cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP9A79 (CmCYP9A79) and glutathionine S-transferase (CmGST). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 6(A) Interaction networks of chitin enzymes associated with chitin biosynthesis based on the STRING website (focused on a specific protein network in Drosophila melanogaster); (B) Chitin metabolic pathway and related genes in C. medinalis. The solid arrow indicates chitin biosynthetic pathway; The dotted arrow and chain line arrow indicates chitin degradation pathway; CDA: chitin deacetylase, CHT: chitinase, Hex: β-l-N-acetylhexosaminidase, CHS: chitin synthase, UAP: UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase, PAGM: phosphoacetylglucosamine mutase, NAGK: N-acetyl-d-glucosamine kinase.