Literature DB >> 26378119

A self-regulating biomolecular comparator for processing oscillatory signals.

Deepak K Agrawal1, Elisa Franco2, Rebecca Schulman3.   

Abstract

While many cellular processes are driven by biomolecular oscillators, precise control of a downstream on/off process by a biochemical oscillator signal can be difficult: over an oscillator's period, its output signal varies continuously between its amplitude limits and spends a significant fraction of the time at intermediate values between these limits. Further, the oscillator's output is often noisy, with particularly large variations in the amplitude. In electronic systems, an oscillating signal is generally processed by a downstream device such as a comparator that converts a potentially noisy oscillatory input into a square wave output that is predominantly in one of two well-defined on and off states. The comparator's output then controls downstream processes. We describe a method for constructing a synthetic biochemical device that likewise produces a square-wave-type biomolecular output for a variety of oscillatory inputs. The method relies on a separation of time scales between the slow rate of production of an oscillatory signal molecule and the fast rates of intermolecular binding and conformational changes. We show how to control the characteristics of the output by varying the concentrations of the species and the reaction rates. We then use this control to show how our approach could be applied to process different in vitro and in vivo biomolecular oscillators, including the p53-Mdm2 transcriptional oscillator and two types of in vitro transcriptional oscillators. These results demonstrate how modular biomolecular circuits could, in principle, be combined to build complex dynamical systems. The simplicity of our approach also suggests that natural molecular circuits may process some biomolecular oscillator outputs before they are applied downstream.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomolecular comparator; dynamical systems; modular; oscillator; synthetic biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26378119      PMCID: PMC4614497          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  32 in total

1.  Circadian clocks limited by noise.

Authors:  N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Near-critical phenomena in intracellular metabolite pools.

Authors:  Johan Elf; Johan Paulsson; Otto G Berg; Måns Ehrenberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome.

Authors:  Archana Belle; Amos Tanay; Ledion Bitincka; Ron Shamir; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Molecular titration and ultrasensitivity in regulatory networks.

Authors:  Nicolas E Buchler; Matthieu Louis
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Control of DNA strand displacement kinetics using toehold exchange.

Authors:  David Yu Zhang; Erik Winfree
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Generation of oscillations by the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop: a theoretical and experimental study.

Authors:  R Lev Bar-Or; R Maya; L A Segel; U Alon; A J Levine; M Oren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Promoter elements associated with RNA Pol II stalling in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  David A Hendrix; Joung-Woo Hong; Julia Zeitlinger; Daniel S Rokhsar; Michael S Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation.

Authors:  Domitilla Del Vecchio; Alexander J Ninfa; Eduardo D Sontag
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Construction of an in vitro bistable circuit from synthetic transcriptional switches.

Authors:  Jongmin Kim; Kristin S White; Erik Winfree
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  A quantitative comparison of sRNA-based and protein-based gene regulation.

Authors:  Pankaj Mehta; Sidhartha Goyal; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 11.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.