Stefano Maggiolini1, Caterina C De Carlini2, Luca A Ferri3, Gualtiero I Colombo4, Gaetano Gentile2, Ester Meles2, Beatrice Riva3, Teresa C Casella5, Massimo Imazio6, Antonio Brucato7. 1. Department of Cardiology, San L. Mandic Hospital, Largo Mandic 1, Merate, Lecco 23807, Italy maggiolinistefano@yahoo.it. 2. Department of Cardiology, San L. Mandic Hospital, Largo Mandic 1, Merate, Lecco 23807, Italy. 3. Department of Cardiology, A. Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy. 4. Laboratory of Immunology and Functional Genomics, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milano, Italy. 5. Department of Radiology, San L. Mandic Hospital, Merate, Lecco, Italy. 6. Cardiology Department, Maria Vittoria Hospital and University of Torino, Torino, Italy. 7. Division of Internal Medicine, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Abstract
AIMS: The role of chest computed tomography (CT) is not well defined for either diagnosis or management of pericardial disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the added value of early chest CT in the diagnostic workup for patients presenting with cardiac tamponade or large pericardial effusion of unknown aetiology as the first manifestation of disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed CT scan on 55 patients with pericardial effusion as defined above, undergoing echo-guided pericardiocentesis. We compared the success rate in making diagnosis and/or staging the underlying disorder of three sequential workups, including, respectively, (i) clinical presentation, inflammatory markers, chest X-ray imaging, (ii) all of the above and pericardial fluid analysis, and (iii) all of the above and chest CT. We were able to make diagnosis in 53 patients (96%): the major cause of effusion was malignancy (38%). Clinical and biochemical data were not able to differentiate non-tumour from tumour patients. CT revealed pathological findings in all patients with malignancy: tumour mass in 15/21 (71%) and pathological lymphadenopathy in the remaining 6 cases. The workup including CT provided a significantly higher diagnostic yield than the other two workups (P < 0.0001), both in the overall population and in the two subgroups of neoplastic (Npl) and non-Npl patients. CONCLUSION: In all patients with cardiac tamponade or large pericardial effusion, CT was useful either in identifying the underlying disease or in excluding other potential causes of pericardial effusion. We conclude that chest CT is a very useful non-invasive diagnostic tool to identify and stage pericardial diseases. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: The role of chest computed tomography (CT) is not well defined for either diagnosis or management of pericardial disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the added value of early chest CT in the diagnostic workup for patients presenting with cardiac tamponade or large pericardial effusion of unknown aetiology as the first manifestation of disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed CT scan on 55 patients with pericardial effusion as defined above, undergoing echo-guided pericardiocentesis. We compared the success rate in making diagnosis and/or staging the underlying disorder of three sequential workups, including, respectively, (i) clinical presentation, inflammatory markers, chest X-ray imaging, (ii) all of the above and pericardial fluid analysis, and (iii) all of the above and chest CT. We were able to make diagnosis in 53 patients (96%): the major cause of effusion was malignancy (38%). Clinical and biochemical data were not able to differentiate non-tumour from tumourpatients. CT revealed pathological findings in all patients with malignancy: tumour mass in 15/21 (71%) and pathological lymphadenopathy in the remaining 6 cases. The workup including CT provided a significantly higher diagnostic yield than the other two workups (P < 0.0001), both in the overall population and in the two subgroups of neoplastic (Npl) and non-Npl patients. CONCLUSION: In all patients with cardiac tamponade or large pericardial effusion, CT was useful either in identifying the underlying disease or in excluding other potential causes of pericardial effusion. We conclude that chest CT is a very useful non-invasive diagnostic tool to identify and stage pericardial diseases. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: M Szturmowicz; A Pawlak-Cieślik; A Fijałkowska; J Gątarek; A Skoczylas; M Dybowska; K Błasińska-Przerwa; R Langfort; W Tomkowski Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Eduardo M Vilela; Catarina Ruivo; Claudio E Guerreiro; Marisa P Silva; Ricardo Ladeiras-Lopes; Daniel Caeiro; Gustavo P Morais; João Primo; Pedro Braga; Nuno Ferreira; José Pedro L Nunes; Vasco Gama Ribeiro Journal: Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2018-08-15