Literature DB >> 26377805

The Italian Version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Analysis of Psychometric Properties.

Anna Mulasso1, Mattia Roppolo2, Robbert J J Gobbens3, Emanuela Rabaglietti1.   

Abstract

This study aims to assess the reliability, construct validity (convergent/divergent), and criterion validity of the Italian version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI). The TFI is a self-report questionnaire for screening frailty in older adults. Two hundred and sixty-seven community-dwelling older adults were involved. Psychometric properties were analyzed using validated instruments. Adverse outcomes such as disability, falls, and visits to a general practitioner were detected. Participants were mainly women (59.9%), with a mean age of 73.4 years (SD = 6.0). Internal consistency reliability was acceptable. Construct validity was good, since each item of the TFI correlated as expected with corresponding frailty measures. Convergent and divergent validity were adequate for all the domains of the TFI. Criterion validity was excellent for disability and mediocre for the other two outcomes. This study supports the validity of the Italian TFI and offers to clinicians and scientists a multidimensional instrument for identifying frail individuals in the Italian context.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  frailty measure; questionnaire; screening; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26377805     DOI: 10.1177/0164027515606192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Aging        ISSN: 0164-0275


  9 in total

1.  Emotion experience and frailty in a sample of Italian community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Anna Mulasso; Laura Argiolu; Mattia Roppolo; Danny Azucar; Emanuela Rabaglietti
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 2.  Exploring the efficiency of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: a review.

Authors:  Robbert Jj Gobbens; Jos Mga Schols; Marcel Alm van Assen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.458

3.  A comparison between an ICT tool and a traditional physical measure for frailty evaluation in older adults.

Authors:  Anna Mulasso; Paolo Riccardo Brustio; Alberto Rainoldi; Gianluca Zia; Luca Feletti; Aurèle N'dja; Susanna Del Signore; Eleonora Poggiogalle; Federica Luisi; Lorenzo Maria Donini
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Instruments for the detection of frailty syndrome in older adults: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jossiana Wilke Faller; David do Nascimento Pereira; Suzana de Souza; Fernando Kenji Nampo; Fabiana de Souza Orlandi; Silvia Matumoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Turkish version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator.

Authors:  Yildiray Topcu; Fatih Tufan; Cihan Kilic
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Indoor Mobility, Frailty, and Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mediation Model.

Authors:  Paolo Riccardo Brustio; Anna Mulasso; Samuel D'Emanuele; Gianluca Zia; Luca Feletti; Susanna Del Signore; Alberto Rainoldi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  A comparison between uni- and multidimensional frailty measures: prevalence, functional status, and relationships with disability.

Authors:  Mattia Roppolo; Anna Mulasso; Robbert J Gobbens; Cristina O Mosso; Emanuela Rabaglietti
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI): New Evidence for Its Validity.

Authors:  Robbert Jj Gobbens; Petra Boersma; Izabella Uchmanowicz; Livia Maria Santiago
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 9.  Assessing Frailty with the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI): A Review of Reliability and Validity.

Authors:  Robbert J Gobbens; Izabella Uchmanowicz
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.458

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.