Literature DB >> 26377771

Two-year prospective study of outcomes following total temporomandibular joint replacement.

L M Gonzalez-Perez1, N Fakih-Gomez2, B Gonzalez-Perez-Somarriba3, G Centeno3, J F Montes-Carmona2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this 2-year prospective study was to investigate outcomes achieved with a stock temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacement system in the management of end-stage TMJ disorders. Fifty-two patients requiring reconstruction (36 unilateral/16 bilateral) were operated on during the period 2006-2012; 68 total prostheses were implanted (Biomet Microfixation TMJ Replacement System). The mean age at surgery was 52.6±11.5 years. Changes in the values of inclusion diagnostic criteria at entry were assessed. These included persistent and significant TMJ pain, functional impairment after failure of other surgical therapies, and imaging evidence consistent with advanced TMJ disease of more than 1-year duration. Subjects were excluded if they presented insufficient quantity/quality of bone to support the TMJ replacement, severe hyperfunctional habits, active infectious disease, or an inability to follow postoperative instructions. Over the 2 years of postoperative follow-up, mean pain intensity was reduced from 6.4±1.4 to 1.6±1.2 (P<0.001), and jaw opening was improved from 2.7±0.9cm to 4.2±0.7cm (P<0.001). During the study period, three of 68 implants (4%) were explanted and new TMJ replacements fitted. The results of this study support the view that the surgical placement of stock TMJ prostheses provides significant long-term improvements in pain and function, with few complications.
Copyright © 2015 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prospective study; temporomandibular joint; temporomandibular joint replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26377771     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.08.992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

Review 1.  Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement: Stick to Stock or Optimization by Customization?

Authors:  Nikolas K G De Meurechy; Carlos E Zaror; Maurice Y Mommaerts
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-02-27

2.  Evaluation of total alloplastic temporo-mandibular joint replacement with two different types of prostheses: A three-year prospective study.

Authors:  L-M Gonzalez-Perez; B Gonzalez-Perez-Somarriba; G Centeno; C Vallellano; J-F Montes-Carmona
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 3.  Alloplastic reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  Rushil R Dang; Pushkar Mehra
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2017-12-02

4.  Temporomandibular joint regeneration: proposal of a novel treatment for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery using transplantation of autologous nasal septum chondrocytes, and the first human case report.

Authors:  Ricardo de Souza Tesch; Esther Rieko Takamori; Karla Menezes; Rosana Bizon Vieira Carias; Cláudio Leonardo Milione Dutra; Marcelo de Freitas Aguiar; Tânia Salgado de Sousa Torraca; Alexandra Cristina Senegaglia; Cármen Lúcia Kuniyoshi Rebelatto; Debora Regina Daga; Paulo Roberto Slud Brofman; Radovan Borojevic
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 5.  Clinical guidelines for total temporomandibular joint replacement.

Authors:  Tetsuya Yoda; Nobumi Ogi; Hiroyuki Yoshitake; Tetsuji Kawakami; Ritsuo Takagi; Kenichiro Murakami; Hidemichi Yuasa; Toshirou Kondoh; Kanchu Tei; Kenichi Kurita
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2020-04-15

6.  Titanium Nickelide in Midface Fractures Treatment.

Authors:  Liudmila Shamanaeva; Ekaterina Diachkova; Pavel Petruk; Kirill Polyakov; Igor Cherkesov; Sergei Ivanov
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2020-07-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.