Literature DB >> 26377262

Objective measurement of the distal resection margin by MRI of the fresh and fixed specimen after partial mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: 5 cm is not just 5 cm and depends on when measured.

Peter Bondeven1, Rikke H Hagemann-Madsen2, Lise Bro3, Brendan J Moran4, Søren Laurberg5, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most studies have directly established the optimal perioperative in situ clearance margin in surgery for rectal cancer from the histologically observed extent of distal spread, neglecting the tissue variability that occurs after resection and fixation of the rectal specimen.
PURPOSE: To measure the length of the distal resection margin in the fresh and fixed specimen following partial mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to document tissue shrinkage after surgical removal and fixation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The length of the distal resection margin was measured by MRI of the fresh and fixed specimen and at histopathological examination of the fixed specimen in 10 patients who underwent surgery for upper rectal cancer. In addition, tissue shrinkage was estimated by measuring the total length of the fresh and fixed specimen and distance from the peritoneal reflection anteriorly to the distal cut edge of the specimen.
RESULTS: Measured by MRI, the distal resection margin was in the range of 0.6-10.2 cm (mean, 4.6 cm) in the fresh specimen, and 0.5-6.2 cm (mean, 3.2 cm) in the fixed specimen. The tissue shrinkage ratio was a mean of 69% (interquartile range, 61-77%). Taking all ratios from MRI and histopathological examination of tissue shrinkage into account, the collective tissue shrinkage ratio was 70% (95% confidence interval, 67-73%)
CONCLUSION: The length of the distal resection margin was reduced by 30% after surgical removal and fixation of the specimen. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdomen/GI; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); neoplasms – primary; rectum

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26377262     DOI: 10.1177/0284185115604007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  4 in total

1.  Distal resection margins in rectal cancer specimens: differences in assessment between surgeons and pathologists and the influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  T L Ghezzi; C Tarta; P C Contu; A R Lazzaron; B M Contin; L M Kliemann; D C Damin
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-07

Review 2.  Required distal mesorectal resection margin in partial mesorectal excision: a systematic review on distal mesorectal spread.

Authors:  A A J Grüter; A S van Lieshout; S E van Oostendorp; J C F Ket; M Tenhagen; F C den Boer; R Hompes; P J Tanis; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.699

3.  Measurement of rectal tumor height from the anal verge on MRI: a comparison of internal versus external anal sphincter.

Authors:  David D B Bates; James L Fuqua; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; Jennifer S Golia Pernicka; Sidra Javed-Tayyab; Viktoriya Paroder; Iva Petkovska; Marc J Gollub
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-17

4.  Impact of a multidisciplinary training programme on outcome of upper rectal cancer by critical appraisal of the extent of mesorectal excision with postoperative MRI.

Authors:  P Bondeven; S Laurberg; R H Hagemann-Madsen; B G Pedersen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-12-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.