David S Freedman1, Hannah G Lawman2, Asheley C Skinner3, Lisa C McGuire4, David B Allison5, Cynthia L Ogden2. 1. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, CDC, Atlanta, GA; dxf1@cdc.gov. 2. National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD; 3. Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and. 4. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, CDC, Atlanta, GA; 5. Nutrition Obesity Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The WHO cutoffs to classify biologically implausible values (BIVs) for weight, height, and weight-for-height in children and adolescents are widely used in data cleaning. OBJECTIVES: We assess 1) the prevalence of these BIVs, 2) whether they were consistent with information on waist circumference, arm circumference, and leg lengths, and 3) the effect of their exclusion on the estimated prevalence of obesity in 2- to 19-y-olds in the NHANES, which is a study in which extreme values were verified when recorded. DESIGN: We conducted cross-sectional analyses in 26,480 children and adolescents in the NHANES from 1999-2000 through 2011-2012. RESULTS: The overall prevalence for a BIV for any body-size measure was 0.9% (n = 277), and almost all BIVs were due to extremely high, rather than low, values. Of 186 subjects who had a high BIV for weight or body mass index (BMI), all but one subject had both arm and waist circumferences that were greater than the sex- and age-specific 95th percentiles; 75% of subjects had circumferences greater than the 99th percentile. Of 63 subjects with a high height BIV, 75% of them had a leg length that was greater than the 95th percentile. The exclusion of children and adolescents with a BIV reduced the overall prevalence of obesity by ∼0.5 percentage points and by 1.7% in non-Hispanic blacks. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the extremely high values of weight, height, and BMI flagged as BIVs in the NHANES are very likely correct. The increase of z score cutoffs or the use of an alternative method to detect possible errors could improve the balance between removing incorrect values and retaining extremely high, but accurate, values in other data sets.
BACKGROUND: The WHO cutoffs to classify biologically implausible values (BIVs) for weight, height, and weight-for-height in children and adolescents are widely used in data cleaning. OBJECTIVES: We assess 1) the prevalence of these BIVs, 2) whether they were consistent with information on waist circumference, arm circumference, and leg lengths, and 3) the effect of their exclusion on the estimated prevalence of obesity in 2- to 19-y-olds in the NHANES, which is a study in which extreme values were verified when recorded. DESIGN: We conducted cross-sectional analyses in 26,480 children and adolescents in the NHANES from 1999-2000 through 2011-2012. RESULTS: The overall prevalence for a BIV for any body-size measure was 0.9% (n = 277), and almost all BIVs were due to extremely high, rather than low, values. Of 186 subjects who had a high BIV for weight or body mass index (BMI), all but one subject had both arm and waist circumferences that were greater than the sex- and age-specific 95th percentiles; 75% of subjects had circumferences greater than the 99th percentile. Of 63 subjects with a high height BIV, 75% of them had a leg length that was greater than the 95th percentile. The exclusion of children and adolescents with a BIV reduced the overall prevalence of obesity by ∼0.5 percentage points and by 1.7% in non-Hispanic blacks. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the extremely high values of weight, height, and BMI flagged as BIVs in the NHANES are very likely correct. The increase of z score cutoffs or the use of an alternative method to detect possible errors could improve the balance between removing incorrect values and retaining extremely high, but accurate, values in other data sets.
Authors: Ning Smith; Karen J Coleman; Jean M Lawrence; Virginia P Quinn; Darios Getahun; Kristi Reynolds; Wansu Chen; Amy H Porter; Steven J Jacobsen; Corinna Koebnick Journal: Int J Pediatr Obes Date: 2010-05-03
Authors: J C Lo; B Maring; M Chandra; S R Daniels; A Sinaiko; M F Daley; N E Sherwood; E O Kharbanda; E D Parker; K F Adams; R J Prineas; D J Magid; P J O'Connor; L C Greenspan Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Keisuke Ejima; Andrew W Brown; Dale A Schoeller; Steven B Heymsfield; Erik J Nelson; David B Allison Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Junhan Cho; Nicholas I Goldenson; Mollie S Pester; Rubin Khoddam; Mariel S Bello; Genevieve F Dunton; Britni R Belcher; Adam M Leventhal Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Christy B Turer; Sarah E Barlow; David B Sarwer; Brian Adamson; Joanne Sanders; Chul Ahn; Song Zhang; Glenn Flores; Celette Sugg Skinner Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Melissa Chambers; Stephanie K Tanamas; Elena J Clark; Diana L Dunnigan; Chirag R Kapadia; Robert L Hanson; Robert G Nelson; William C Knowler; Madhumita Sinha Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: David S Freedman; Hannah G Lawman; Liping Pan; Asheley C Skinner; David B Allison; Lisa C McGuire; Heidi M Blanck Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Carrie Daymont; Michelle E Ross; A Russell Localio; Alexander G Fiks; Richard C Wasserman; Robert W Grundmeier Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: TaShauna U Goldsby; Brandon J George; Valerie A Yeager; Bisakha P Sen; Alva Ferdinand; Devon M T Sims; Bryn Manzella; Asheley Cockrell Skinner; David B Allison; Nir Menachemi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 3.390