Literature DB >> 26376354

Statistical method for determining and comparing limits of detection of bioassays.

Carly A Holstein1, Maryclare Griffin2, Jing Hong2, Paul D Sampson2.   

Abstract

The current bioassay development literature lacks the use of statistically robust methods for calculating the limit of detection of a given assay. Instead, researchers often employ simple methods that provide a rough estimate of the limit of detection, often without a measure of the confidence in the estimate. This scarcity of robust methods is likely due to a realistic preference for simple and accessible methods and to a lack of such methods that have reduced the concepts of limit of detection theory to practice for the specific application of bioassays. Here, we have developed a method for determining limits of detection for bioassays that is statistically robust and reduced to practice in a clear and accessible manner geared at researchers, not statisticians. This method utilizes a four-parameter logistic curve fit to translate signal intensity to analyte concentration, which is a curve that is commonly employed in quantitative bioassays. This method generates a 95% confidence interval of the limit of detection estimate to provide a measure of uncertainty and a means by which to compare the analytical sensitivities of different assays statistically. We have demonstrated this method using real data from the development of a paper-based influenza assay in our laboratory to illustrate the steps and features of the method. Using this method, assay developers can calculate statistically valid limits of detection and compare these values for different assays to determine when a change to the assay design results in a statistically significant improvement in analytical sensitivity.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26376354     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  14 in total

1.  Nonlinear Regression Improves Accuracy of Characterization of Multiplexed Mass Spectrometric Assays.

Authors:  Cyril Galitzine; Jarrett D Egertson; Susan Abbatiello; Clark M Henderson; Lindsay K Pino; Michael MacCoss; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Olga Vitek
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  An integrated device for the rapid and sensitive detection of the influenza hemagglutinin.

Authors:  Caitlin E Anderson; Joshua R Buser; Alexis M Fleming; Eva-Maria Strauch; Paula D Ladd; Janet Englund; David Baker; Paul Yager
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Fingerpick Blood-Based Nucleic Acid Testing on A USB Interfaced Device towards HIV self-testing.

Authors:  Tianyi Liu; Gihoon Choi; Zifan Tang; Aneesh Kshirsagar; Anthony J Politza; Weihua Guan
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 12.545

4.  Affinity enrichment for mass spectrometry: improving the yield of low abundance biomarkers.

Authors:  Brianna Kim; Robyn Araujo; Marissa Howard; Ruben Magni; Lance A Liotta; Alessandra Luchini
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.940

5.  Understanding Signal and Background in a Thermally Resolved, Single-Branched DNA Assay Using Square Wave Voltammetry.

Authors:  Subramaniam Somasundaram; Mark D Holtan; Christopher J Easley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Tutorial: design and fabrication of nanoparticle-based lateral-flow immunoassays.

Authors:  Claudio Parolo; Amadeo Sena-Torralba; José Francisco Bergua; Enric Calucho; Celia Fuentes-Chust; Liming Hu; Lourdes Rivas; Ruslan Álvarez-Diduk; Emily P Nguyen; Stefano Cinti; Daniel Quesada-González; Arben Merkoçi
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  A Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Device for Type-II Pyrethroid Targets in an Environmental Water Sample.

Authors:  Sumate Pengpumkiat; Jintana Nammoonnoy; Watcharaporn Wongsakoonkan; Pajaree Konthonbut; Pornpimol Kongtip
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Harnessing recombinase polymerase amplification for rapid multi-gene detection of SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Dounia Cherkaoui; Da Huang; Benjamin S Miller; Valérian Turbé; Rachel A McKendry
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Subtractive inhibition assay for the detection of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken samples using surface plasmon resonance.

Authors:  Noor Azlina Masdor; Zeynep Altintas; Mohd Yunus Shukor; Ibtisam E Tothill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A progesterone biosensor derived from microbial screening.

Authors:  Chloé Grazon; R C Baer; Uroš Kuzmanović; Thuy Nguyen; Mingfu Chen; Marjon Zamani; Margaret Chern; Patricia Aquino; Xiaoman Zhang; Sébastien Lecommandoux; Andy Fan; Mario Cabodi; Catherine Klapperich; Mark W Grinstaff; Allison M Dennis; James E Galagan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.