Literature DB >> 26376219

3D/4D sonography - any safety problem.

Ritsuko K Pooh, Kazuo Maeda, Asim Kurjak, Cihat Sen, Alaa Ebrashy, Abdallah Adra, Aliyu Labaran Dayyabu, Tuangsit Wataganara, Renato Augusto Moreira de Sá, Milan Stanojevic.   

Abstract

Gray-scale image data are processed in 3D ultrasound by repeated scans of multiple planes within a few seconds to achieve one surface rendering image and three perpendicular plane images. The 4D image is achieved by repeating 3D images in short intervals, i.e. 3D and 4D ultrasound are based on simple B-mode images. During 3D/4D acquisition, a fetus in utero is exposed by ultrasound beam for only a few seconds, and it is as short as real-time B-mode scanning. Therefore, simple 3D imaging is as safe as a simple B-mode scan. The 4D ultrasound is also as safe as a simple B-mode scan, but the ultrasound exposure should be shorter than 30 min. The thermal index (TI) and mechanical index (MI) should both be lower than 1.0, and the ultrasound study is regulated by the Doppler ultrasound if it is combined with simple 3D or 4D ultrasound. Recently, some articles have reported the functional changes of animal fetal brain neuronal cells and liver cell apoptosis with Doppler ultrasound. We discuss cell apoptosis by ultrasound in this report. Diagnostic ultrasound safety is achieved by controlling the output pulse and continuous ultrasound waves using thermal and mechanical indices, which should be <1.0 in abdominal and transvaginal scan, pulsed Doppler, as well as 3D and 4D ultrasound. The lowest spatial peak temporal average (SPTA) intensity of the ultrasound to suppress cultured cell growth is 240 mW/cm2, below which no ultrasound effect has been reported. An ultrasound user must be trained to recognize the ultrasound bioeffects; thermal and mechanical indices, and how to reduce these when they are higher than 1.0 on the monitor display; and guide the proper use of the ultrasound under the ALARA principle, because the user is responsible for ensuring ultrasound safety.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26376219     DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  2 in total

1.  Advanced ultrasound for prenatal interventions.

Authors:  Katika Nawapun; Nisarat Phithakwatchara; Suparat Jaingam; Sommai Viboonchart; Nadda Mongkolchat; Tuangsit Wataganara
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2018-05-02

2.  Study protocol for a prospective cohort study to investigate Hemodynamic Adaptation to Pregnancy and Placenta-related Outcome: the HAPPO study.

Authors:  Rianne C Bijl; Jérôme M J Cornette; Annemien E van den Bosch; Johannes J Duvekot; Jeroen Molinger; Sten P Willemsen; Anton H J Koning; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Arie Franx; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen; Maria P H Koster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.