Ditte L Vernal1,2, Sandeep Kapoor2, Aseel Al-Jadiri2, Eva M Sheridan2, Yehonathan Borenstein2, Charles Mormando2, Lisa David2, Sukhbir Singh2, Andrew J Seidman2, Maren Carbon2, Miriam Gerstenberg3, Ema Saito2, John M Kane2,4,5,6, Hans-Christoph Steinhausen1,7,8, Christoph U Correll2,4,5,6. 1. 1 Research Unit for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric Hospital, Aalborg University Hospital , Denmark . 2. 2 The Zucker Hillside Hospital , Psychiatry Research, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, New York. 3. 3 University Clinics of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Zurich , Switzerland . 4. 4 Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine , Hempstead, New York. 5. 5 Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx, New York. 6. 6 The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research , Manhasset, New York. 7. 7 Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Basel , Switzerland . 8. 8 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Zurich , Switzerland .
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess differences in the outcomes of youth with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SCZ-S) and psychotic disorder not otherwise specified (PsyNOS) during early antipsychotic treatment. METHODS: The study was a prospective, naturalistic, inception cohort study of youth ≤19 years old with SCZ-S (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder) or PsyNOS (PsyNOS, brief psychotic disorder) and ≤24 months of lifetime antipsychotic treatment receiving clinician's choice antipsychotic treatment. Baseline demographic, illness and treatment variables, and effectiveness outcomes were compared at 12 weeks last-observation-carried-forward across SCZ-S and PsyNOS patients, adjusting for significantly different baseline variables. RESULTS: Altogether, 130 youth with SCZ-S (n=42) or PsyNOS (n=88), mostly antipsychotic naïve (76.9%), were prescribed risperidone (47.7%), olanzapine (19.2%), aripiprazole (14.6%), quetiapine (11.5%), or ziprasidone (6.9%). Compared with those with PsyNOS, SCZ-S youth were older (16.4±2.1 vs. 14.8±3.2, p=0.0040), and less likely to be Caucasian (19.1% vs. 42.5%, p=0.009). At baseline, SCZ-S patients had significantly higher Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scores (6.0±0.9 vs. 5.5±0.8, p=0.0018) and lower Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) scores (29.6±9.2 vs. 36.1±8.9, p=0.0002) and were more likely to be in the severely ill CGAS group (i.e., CGAS≤40). SCZ-S and PsyNOS patients did not differ regarding all-cause discontinuation (40.5 vs. 40.3%. p=0.49), discontinuation because of adverse effects (12.2% vs. 12.4%, p=0.97), or nonadherence (29.3% vs. 30.9%, p=0.88), but somewhat more SCZ-S patients discontinued treatment for inefficacy (19.5% vs. 7.4%, p=0.063). CGI-S and CGAS scores improved significantly in both diagnostic groups (p=0.0001, each). Adjusting for baseline differences, PsyNOS patients experienced significantly better CGI-I improvement (CGI-I) scores (p=0.012) and more frequently reached higher categorical CGAS group status (p=0.021) than SCZ-S patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both youth with SCZ-S and those with PsyNOS experienced significant improvements with clinician's choice antipsychotic treatment. However, treatment discontinuation was common within 12 weeks, with greater inefficacy-related discontinuation in the SCZ-S group, whereas CGI-I and CGAS score-based improvements were greater in the PsyNOS group.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess differences in the outcomes of youth with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SCZ-S) and psychotic disorder not otherwise specified (PsyNOS) during early antipsychotic treatment. METHODS: The study was a prospective, naturalistic, inception cohort study of youth ≤19 years old with SCZ-S (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder) or PsyNOS (PsyNOS, brief psychotic disorder) and ≤24 months of lifetime antipsychotic treatment receiving clinician's choice antipsychotic treatment. Baseline demographic, illness and treatment variables, and effectiveness outcomes were compared at 12 weeks last-observation-carried-forward across SCZ-S and PsyNOSpatients, adjusting for significantly different baseline variables. RESULTS: Altogether, 130 youth with SCZ-S (n=42) or PsyNOS (n=88), mostly antipsychotic naïve (76.9%), were prescribed risperidone (47.7%), olanzapine (19.2%), aripiprazole (14.6%), quetiapine (11.5%), or ziprasidone (6.9%). Compared with those with PsyNOS, SCZ-S youth were older (16.4±2.1 vs. 14.8±3.2, p=0.0040), and less likely to be Caucasian (19.1% vs. 42.5%, p=0.009). At baseline, SCZ-Spatients had significantly higher Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scores (6.0±0.9 vs. 5.5±0.8, p=0.0018) and lower Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) scores (29.6±9.2 vs. 36.1±8.9, p=0.0002) and were more likely to be in the severely ill CGAS group (i.e., CGAS≤40). SCZ-S and PsyNOSpatients did not differ regarding all-cause discontinuation (40.5 vs. 40.3%. p=0.49), discontinuation because of adverse effects (12.2% vs. 12.4%, p=0.97), or nonadherence (29.3% vs. 30.9%, p=0.88), but somewhat more SCZ-Spatients discontinued treatment for inefficacy (19.5% vs. 7.4%, p=0.063). CGI-S and CGAS scores improved significantly in both diagnostic groups (p=0.0001, each). Adjusting for baseline differences, PsyNOSpatients experienced significantly better CGI-I improvement (CGI-I) scores (p=0.012) and more frequently reached higher categorical CGAS group status (p=0.021) than SCZ-Spatients. CONCLUSIONS: Both youth with SCZ-S and those with PsyNOS experienced significant improvements with clinician's choice antipsychotic treatment. However, treatment discontinuation was common within 12 weeks, with greater inefficacy-related discontinuation in the SCZ-S group, whereas CGI-I and CGAS score-based improvements were greater in the PsyNOS group.
Authors: Barbara A Cornblatt; Ricardo E Carrión; Andrea Auther; Danielle McLaughlin; Ruth H Olsen; Majnu John; Christoph U Correll Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Ignacio Díaz; Jose María Pelayo-Terán; Rocío Pérez-Iglesias; Ignacio Mata; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Paula Suárez-Pinilla; José Luis Vázquez-Barquero; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Christoph U Correll; Peter Manu; Vladimir Olshanskiy; Barbara Napolitano; John M Kane; Anil K Malhotra Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Marie Stentebjerg-Olesen; Pia Jeppesen; Anne K Pagsberg; Anders Fink-Jensen; Sandeep Kapoor; Raja Chekuri; Maren Carbon; Aseel Al-Jadiri; Taishiro Kishimoto; John M Kane; Christoph U Correll Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Line Widing; Carmen Simonsen; Camilla B Flaaten; Beathe Haatveit; Ruth Kristine Vik; Kristin F Wold; Gina Åsbø; Torill Ueland; Ingrid Melle Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 4.157