Literature DB >> 26375527

Conventional Versus Cross-Linked Polyethylene for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Michele F Surace, Luca Monestier, Ettore Vulcano, Steven F Harwin, Paolo Cherubino.   

Abstract

The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 88 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with either conventional polyethylene or cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) from the same manufacturer were compared. There were no significant differences between the 2 subpopulations regarding average age, gender, side affected, or prosthetic stem and cup size. The average follow-up was 104 months (range, 55 to 131 months). To the authors' knowledge, this is the longest follow-up for this particular insert. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually. Results showed that XLPE has a significantly greater wear reduction than that of standard polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty. At the longest available follow-up for these specific inserts, XLPE proved to be effective in reducing wear. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26375527     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150902-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  2 in total

1.  Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness for long-term follow-up of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lindsay K Smith; Emma Dures; A D Beswick
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2019-07-02

2.  Influence of Accelerated Aging on the Wear Behavior of Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liners-A Hip Simulator Study.

Authors:  Rebecca H Dammer; Carmen Zietz; Jörn Reinders; Michael Teske; Rainer Bader
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.