Literature DB >> 26375514

Interaction effect of contingency management and sex on delay-discounting changes among treatment-seeking smokers.

Sara Weidberg1, Reid D Landes2, Olaya García-Rodríguez1, Jin H Yoon3, Roberto Secades-Villa1.   

Abstract

Despite the potential influence of sex on delay-discounting rates, there is no previous evidence with regard to the effect of this variable on the clinical interventions aimed at modifying delay-discounting rates. This study assessed the effect of sex on the association between the type of treatment received (either cognitive-behavioral treatment [CBT] alone or combined with contingency management [CM + CBT]) and delay-discounting changes at end of treatment and 6-month follow-up. This aim was addressed after controlling for the influence of baseline delay discounting. Treatment-seeking smokers (N = 116) were randomly assigned to either CM + CBT (n = 69) or CBT alone (n = 47). Participants completed delay-discounting assessments at intake, at end of treatment, and at 6-month follow-up. Results showed that there was a significant interaction effect of treatment type and sex, such that women who received CM decreased their discounting more than women who did not. However, this effect was not found among men. Participants who discounted most at intake showed the greatest delay-discounting decreases. Lastly, smoking abstinence did not affect changes in delay discounting. The current results suggest that CM intervention may have a differential effect on delay-discounting changes as a function of sex. This finding supports the relevance of considering the effect of individual variables when assessing changes in delay discounting due to clinical interventions. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26375514     DOI: 10.1037/pha0000043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  8 in total

1.  Delay Discounting of Video Game Players: Comparison of Time Duration Among Gamers.

Authors:  Frank D Buono; Matthew E Sprong; Daniel P Lloyd; Christopher J Cutter; Destiny M B Printz; Ryan M Sullivan; Brent A Moore
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2017-01-24

2.  Tobacco demand, delay discounting, and smoking topography among smokers with and without psychopathology.

Authors:  Samantha G Farris; Elizabeth R Aston; Ana M Abrantes; Michael J Zvolensky
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09

Review 4.  Neuropsychological Interventions for Decision-Making in Addiction: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Antonio Verdejo-García; Miguel A Alcázar-Córcoles; Natalia Albein-Urios
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Delay discounting rate by a surrogate decision maker depends on the smoking status of the recipient.

Authors:  Briana de Cola; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hanneke Scholten; Anouk Scheres; Erik de Water; Uta Graf; Isabela Granic; Maartje Luijten
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

7.  Rejecting impulsivity as a psychological construct: A theoretical, empirical, and sociocultural argument.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Delay discounting in e-cigarette users, current and former smokers.

Authors:  Sara Weidberg; Alba González-Roz; Roberto Secades-Villa
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2016-10-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.