Literature DB >> 26375371

The tradeoff between signal detection and recognition rules auditory sensitivity under variable background noise conditions.

Marco Lugli1.   

Abstract

Animal acoustic communication commonly takes place under masked conditions. For instance, sound signals relevant for mating and survival are very often masked by background noise, which makes their detection and recognition by organisms difficult. Ambient noise (AN) varies in level and shape among different habitats, but also remarkable variations in time and space occurs within the same habitat. Variable AN conditions mask hearing thresholds of the receiver in complex and unpredictable ways, thereby causing distortions in sound perception. When communication takes place in a noisy environment, a highly sensitive system might confer no advantage to the receiver compared to a less sensitive one. The effects of noise masking on auditory thresholds and hearing-related functions are well known, and the potential role of AN in the evolution of the species' auditory sensitivity has been recognized by few authors. The mechanism of the underlying selection process has never been explored, however. Here I present a simple fitness model that seeks for the best sensitivity of a hearing system performing the detection and recognition of the sound under variable AN conditions. The model predicts higher sensitivity (i.e. lower hearing thresholds) as best strategy for species living in quiet habitats and lower sensitivity (i.e. higher hearing thresholds) as best strategy for those living in noisy habitats provided the cost of incorrect recognition is not low. The tradeoff between detection and recognition of acoustic signals appears to be a key factor determining the best level of hearing sensitivity of a species when acoustic communication is corrupted by noise.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Acoustic communication; Fitness analysis; Hearing thresholds; Noise masking; Noise spectrum shape; Sound level

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26375371     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  1 in total

1.  Hearing capacities and morphology of the auditory system in Serrasalmidae (Teleostei: Otophysi).

Authors:  Geoffrey Mélotte; Eric Parmentier; Christian Michel; Anthony Herrel; Kelly Boyle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.