Ravina Kullar1, Angela Vassallo2, Sarah Turkel2, Teena Chopra3, Keith S Kaye3, Sorabh Dhar4. 1. Department of Medical Affairs, Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Lexington, MA. Electronic address: ravina.kullar@gmail.com. 2. Department of Infection Prevention/Epidemiology, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA. 3. Department of Medicine, Wayne State University and Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI. 4. Division of Infectious Diseases, Detroit Medical Center, John D Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI. Electronic address: sdhar@med.wayne.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contact precautions (CPs) are recommended to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission in institutions. Rising doubts about CP effectiveness and recognition of unintended consequences for patients have raised questions about the benefit. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse outcomes associated with CPs for prevention of MRSA transmission. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles related to effectiveness and adverse outcomes of CPs in patients with MRSA. Criteria for inclusion included the following: articles conducted in the United States, articles performed in an acute care setting, articles that were not a case series or review, and those with standardized collection of data or inclusion of case and control groups. Results were summarized and examined for potential limitations. Recommendations were based on our findings. RESULTS: CPs reduced MRSA transmission in epidemic settings and in instances with high compliance, but a decrease in infection rates was not shown. Unintended consequences of CPs include decreased health care provider (HCP) time spent with patients, low HCP compliance, decreased perceptions of comfort from patients, and greater likelihood of patient complaints and negative psychologic implications. CONCLUSION: In endemic settings, there are few data to support routine use of CPs to control the spread of MRSA. Education should be performed in hospitals to improve patients' perception of care and understanding of CPs when implemented and HCPs' adherence to good hand hygiene and standard precautions practices. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Contact precautions (CPs) are recommended to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission in institutions. Rising doubts about CP effectiveness and recognition of unintended consequences for patients have raised questions about the benefit. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse outcomes associated with CPs for prevention of MRSA transmission. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles related to effectiveness and adverse outcomes of CPs in patients with MRSA. Criteria for inclusion included the following: articles conducted in the United States, articles performed in an acute care setting, articles that were not a case series or review, and those with standardized collection of data or inclusion of case and control groups. Results were summarized and examined for potential limitations. Recommendations were based on our findings. RESULTS:CPs reduced MRSA transmission in epidemic settings and in instances with high compliance, but a decrease in infection rates was not shown. Unintended consequences of CPs include decreased health care provider (HCP) time spent with patients, low HCP compliance, decreased perceptions of comfort from patients, and greater likelihood of patient complaints and negative psychologic implications. CONCLUSION: In endemic settings, there are few data to support routine use of CPs to control the spread of MRSA. Education should be performed in hospitals to improve patients' perception of care and understanding of CPs when implemented and HCPs' adherence to good hand hygiene and standard precautions practices. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Barrier precautions; Contact isolation; Contact precautions; Gloves; Gowning; Hand hygiene; Infection prevention; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Standard precautions; Transmission-based precautions
Authors: J Masse; A Elkalioubie; C Blazejewski; G Ledoux; F Wallet; J Poissy; S Preau; S Nseir Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 3.267