Literature DB >> 26375346

Anophthalmic socket: choice of orbital implants for reconstruction.

Silvana Artioli Schellini1, Regina El Dib1, Roberto Murillo Limongi2, Ricardo Mörschbächer3.   

Abstract

This literature review considers the treatment of an anophthalmic socket and the controversial aspects of the implants used to restore the lost volume after enucleation or evisceration, including the different materials employed and the main problems encountered during anophthalmic socket reconstruction. Since the 1980s, when integrated implants were proposed, there has been much controversy about what is the best implant for restoring the lost volume in an anophthalmic socket: integrated or non-integrated implants. Thus, we present this literature review to provide guidance to doctors and consumers.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26375346     DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20150068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol        ISSN: 0004-2749            Impact factor:   0.872


  3 in total

Review 1.  Integrated versus non-integrated orbital implants for treating anophthalmic sockets.

Authors:  Silvana Schellini; Regina El Dib; Leandro Re Silva; Joyce G Farat; Yuqing Zhang; Eliane C Jorge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-07

2.  Orbital Floor Blowout Fracture Reconstruction Using Moldable Polymethyl Methacrylate: A Report of Two Cases and Their Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Majed Fehaid AlSubaie; Abdulaziz Mohammad Al-Sharydah; Hala M Nassim; Abrar Alhawsawi
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  A Novel Method for the Management of Anophthalmic Socket.

Authors:  Srinivasa B Rao; Savita Akki; Deepak Kumar; Sunil Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2017-06-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.