Literature DB >> 26375263

Setting mastery learning standards.

Rachel Yudkowsky1, Yoon Soo Park, Matthew Lineberry, Aaron Knox, E Matthew Ritter.   

Abstract

Mastery learning is an instructional approach in which educational progress is based on demonstrated performance, not curricular time. Learners practice and retest repeatedly until they reach a designated mastery level; the final level of achievement is the same for all, although time to mastery may vary. Given the unique properties of mastery learning assessments, a thoughtful approach to establishing the performance levels and metrics that determine when a learner has demonstrated mastery is essential.Standard-setting procedures require modification when used for mastery learning settings in health care, particularly regarding the use of evidence-based performance data, the determination of appropriate benchmark or comparison groups, and consideration of patient safety consequences. Information about learner outcomes and past performance data of learners successful at the subsequent level of training can be more helpful than traditional information about test performance of past examinees. The marginally competent "borderline student" or "borderline group" referenced in traditional item-based and examinee-based procedures will generally need to be redefined in mastery settings. Patient safety considerations support conjunctive standards for key knowledge and skill subdomains and for items that have an impact on clinical outcomes. Finally, traditional psychometric indices used to evaluate the quality of standards do not necessarily reflect critical measurement properties of mastery assessments. Mastery learning and testing are essential to the achievement and assessment of entrustable professional activities and residency milestones. With careful attention, sound mastery standard-setting procedures can provide an essential step toward improving the effectiveness of health professions education, patient safety, and patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26375263     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  25 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) skills examination.

Authors:  Matthew Lineberry; E Matthew Ritter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Understanding Preclerkship Medical Students' Poor Performance in Prescription Writing.

Authors:  Henry James; Khalid A J Al Khaja; Yasin I Tayem; Sindhan Veeramuthu; Reginald P Sequeira
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2016-05-15

3.  Content validity evidence for a simulation-based test of handheld otoscopy skills.

Authors:  Josefine Hastrup von Buchwald; Martin Frendø; Mads J Guldager; Jacob Melchiors; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Otologic Skills Training.

Authors:  Gregory J Wiet; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Assessment of Residents Readiness to Perform Lumbar Puncture: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Mikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen; Troels Wienecke; Helle Thagesen; Rikke Vita Borre Jacobsen; Yousif Subhi; Charlotte Ringsted; Lars Konge
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The Effect of Judge Selection on Standard Setting Using the Mastery Angoff Method during Development of a Ventricular Assist Device Self-Care Curriculum.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Barsuk; Rebecca S Harap; Elaine R Cohen; Kenzie A Cameron; Kathleen L Grady; Jane E Wilcox; Kerry B Shanklin; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Clin Simul Nurs       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.391

7.  Using virtual-reality simulation to ensure basic competence in hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Mona M Savran; Anders Bo Nielsen; Bente Baekholm Poulsen; Poul Bak Thorsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Performance Standards of Comprehensive Airway Management for Emergency Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Ashish R Panchal; David P Way; Andrew M King; Rachel Yudkowsky; Thomas E Terndrup
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2018-10-12

9.  Effect of Trainee Performance Data on Standard-Setting Judgments Using the Mastery Angoff Method.

Authors:  Stuart B Prenner; William C McGaghie; Sarah Chuzi; Eric Cantey; Aashish Didwania; Jeffrey H Barsuk
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-06

10.  Setting a Minimum Passing Standard for the Uncertainty Communication Checklist Through Patient and Physician Engagement.

Authors:  David H Salzman; Kristin L Rising; Kenzie A Cameron; Rhea E Powell; Dimitri Papanagnou; Amanda Doty; Katherine Piserchia; Lori Latimer; William C McGaghie; Danielle M McCarthy
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.