Literature DB >> 26375185

Embedded Performance Validity Measures with Postdeployment Veterans: Cross-Validation and Efficiency with Multiple Measures.

Robert D Shura1, Holly M Miskey1, Jared A Rowland2, Ruth E Yoash-Gantz1, John H Denning3.   

Abstract

Embedded validity measures support comprehensive assessment of performance validity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of individual embedded measures and to reduce them to the most efficient combination. The sample included 212 postdeployment veterans (average age = 35 years, average education = 14 years). Thirty embedded measures were initially identified as predictors of Green's Word Memory Test (WMT) and were derived from the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II), Conners' Continuous Performance Test-Second Edition (CPT-II), Trail Making Test, Stroop, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition Letter-Number Sequencing, Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, and the Finger Tapping Test. Eight nonoverlapping measures with the highest area-under-the-curve (AUC) values were retained for entry into a logistic regression analysis. Embedded measure accuracy was also compared to cutoffs found in the existing literature. Twenty-one percent of the sample failed the WMT. Previously developed cutoffs for individual measures showed poor sensitivity (SN) in the current sample except for the CPT-II (Total Errors, SN = .41). The CVLT-II (Trials 1-5 Total) showed the best overall accuracy (AUC = .80). After redundant measures were statistically eliminated, the model included the RCFT (Recognition True Positives), CPT-II (Total Errors), and CVLT-II (Trials 1-5 Total) and increased overall accuracy compared with the CVLT-II alone (AUC = .87). The combination of just 3 measures from the CPT-II, CVLT-II, and RCFT was the most accurate/efficient in predicting WMT performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Word Memory Test; multiple measures; neuropsychological assessment; performance validity; veteran

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26375185     DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2015.1014556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol Adult        ISSN: 2327-9095            Impact factor:   2.248


  4 in total

1.  Neurocognitive markers of childhood abuse in individuals with PTSD: Findings from the INTRuST Clinical Consortium.

Authors:  Jessica Bomyea; Alan N Simmons; Martha E Shenton; Michael J Coleman; Sylvain Bouix; Yogesh Rathi; Ofer Pasternak; Raul Coimbra; Lori Shutter; Mark S George; Gerald Grant; Ross D Zafonte; Thomas W McAllister; Murray B Stein
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  The Post-Deployment Mental Health (PDMH) study and repository: A multi-site study of US Afghanistan and Iraq era veterans.

Authors:  Mira Brancu; H Ryan Wagner; Rajendra A Morey; Jean C Beckham; Patrick S Calhoun; Larry A Tupler; Christine E Marx; Katherine H Taber; Robin A Hurley; Jared Rowland; Scott D McDonald; Jeffrey M Hoerle; Scott D Moore; Harold S Kudler; Richard D Weiner; John A Fairbank
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Benefits and challenges of using logistic regression to assess neuropsychological performance validity: Evidence from a simulation study.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Robert J Spencer
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.373

Review 4.  A Meta-Analysis of Relationships between Measures of Wisconsin Card Sorting and Intelligence.

Authors:  Bruno Kopp; Natasha Maldonado; Jannik F Scheffels; Merle Hendel; Florian Lange
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-11-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.