Literature DB >> 26375176

Acid Resistance and Molecular Characterization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Different Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli Serogroups.

Gwang-Hee Kim1, Frederick Breidt2, Pina Fratamico3, Deog-Hwan Oh1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the acid resistance (AR) of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains belonging to serogroups O26, O45, O103, O104, O111, O121, and O145 with O157:H7 STEC isolated from various sources in 400 mM acetic acid solutions (AAS) at pH 3.2 and 30 °C for 25 min with or without glutamic acid. Furthermore, the molecular subgrouping of the STEC strains was analyzed with the repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) method using a DiversiLab(TM) system. Results for a total of 52 strains ranged from 0.31 to 5.45 log reduction CFU/mL in the absence of glutamic acid and 0.02 to 0.33 CFU/mL in the presence of glutamic acid except for B447 (O26:H11), B452 (O45:H2), and B466 (O104:H4) strains. Strains belonging to serogroups O111, O121, and O103 showed higher AR than serotype O157:H7 strains in the absence of glutamic acid. All STEC O157:H7 strains exhibited a comparable DNA pattern with more than 95% similarity in the rep-PCR results, as did the strains belonging to serogroups O111 and O121. Surprisingly, the DNA pattern of B458 (O103:H2) was similar to that of O157:H7 strains with 82% similarity, and strain B458 strain showed the highest AR to AAS among the O103 strains with 0.44 log reduction CFU/mL without glutamic acid. In conclusion, STEC serotypes isolated from different sources exhibited diverse AR and genetic subtyping patterns. Results indicated that some non-O157 STEC strains may have higher AR than STEC O157:H7 strains under specific acidic conditions, and the addition of glutamic acid provided enhanced protection against exposure to AAS.
© 2015 Institute of Food Technologists®

Entities:  

Keywords:  DiversiLabTM system; E. coli non-O157; acid resistance; glutamic acid; repetitive sequence-based PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26375176     DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.12996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  5 in total

1.  Safety of using Escherichia coli bacteriophages as a sanitizing agent based on inflammatory responses in rats.

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Hwang; Jung-Eun Kim; Yoon-Jae Song; Jong-Hyun Park
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.391

2.  Transmission patterns of Streptococcus mutans demonstrated by a combined rep-PCR and MLST approach.

Authors:  Stephanie S Momeni; Jennifer Whiddon; Stephen A Moser; Noel K Childers
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Listeria monocytogenes and Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in Yogurt.

Authors:  So Young Yang; Ki Sun Yoon
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-27

4.  Complete Genome Sequences of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Strains SRCC 1675 and 28RC, Which Vary in Acid Resistance.

Authors:  Gian Marco Baranzoni; Pina M Fratamico; Erin R Reichenberger; Gwang-Hee Kim; Frederick Breidt; Kathryn Kay; Deog-Hwan Oh
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-07-28

5.  Preservative effect of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis) extract on their molecular docking, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties.

Authors:  Momna Rubab; Ramachandran Chellia; Kandasamy Saravanakumar; Suresh Mandava; Imran Khan; Charles Nkufi Tango; Mohammad Shakhawat Hussain; Eric Banan-Mwine Daliri; Se-Hun Kim; Sudha Rani Ramakrishnan; Myeong-Hyeon Wang; Jongkook Lee; Joong-Ho Kwon; Sangeeta Chandrashekar; Deog-Hwan Oh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.