| Literature DB >> 26375160 |
Alan J Kennedy1, Matthew S Hull2,3, Stephen Diamond3, Mark Chappell1, Anthony J Bednar1, Jennifer G Laird1, Nicholas L Melby1, Jeffery A Steevens1.
Abstract
Mass concentration is the standard convention to express exposure in ecotoxicology for dissolved substances. However, nanotoxicology has challenged the suitability of the mass concentration dose metric. Alternative metrics often discussed in the literature include particle number, surface area, and ion release (kinetics, equilibrium). It is unlikely that any single metric is universally applicable to all types of nanoparticles. However, determining the optimal metric for a specific type of nanoparticle requires novel studies to generate supportive data and employ methods to compensate for current analytical capability gaps. This investigation generated acute toxicity data for two standard species (Ceriodaphnia dubia, Pimephales promelas) exposed to five sizes (10, 20, 30, 60, 100 nm) of monodispersed citrate- and polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated silver nanoparticles. Particles were sized by various techniques to populate available models for expressing the particle number, surface area, and dissolved fraction. Results indicate that the acute toxicity of the tested silver nanoparticles is best expressed by ion release, and is relatable to total exposed surface area. Particle number was not relatable to the observed acute silver nanoparticle effects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26375160 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 9.028