| Literature DB >> 26375026 |
Wenjun Wang1, Xiaobin Ma1, Mingming Zou1, Peng Jiang1, Weixin Hu1, Jiao Li1, Zijian Zhi1, Jianle Chen1, Shan Li1, Tian Ding1,2, Xingqian Ye1,3,2, Donghong Liu1,3,2.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Mature-green cherry tomato fruits (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Jinyu) were exposed to different power densities of ultrasound (66.64, 106.19, and 145.74 W/L) at 25 °C to study ultrasound non-thermal effects on the storage properties. Among the three levels of ultrasound irradiation, 106.19 W/L ultrasound was effective in reducing the spoilage microorganisms, delaying postharvest ripening through inhibiting ethylene production and respiration rates, and consequently maintaining fruit firmness, flavor, enzyme activities, antioxidants (total phenolics, total flavonoids), and the total antioxidant capacity of cherry tomatoes. The 66.64 W/L ultrasound had similar effects but to a lesser extent. Meanwhile, although 145.74 W/L ultrasound resulted in higher content of ascorbic acid (AA), it showed many negative effects on the storage quality of fruits. These results demonstrated that ultrasound of appropriate power density had great potentials in inhibiting decay, maintaining flavor and nutritional quality of cherry tomatoes. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Recently, ultrasound has been considered as a multifunctional pretreatment method for the preservation of postharvest fruits and vegetables. Although the preservation effects were slight because of the screening of the thermal effects, its non-thermal effects presented potentials in improving storage quality of cherry tomato. Further studies are needed to explore the combinations between ultrasound with heating as well as other postharvest preservation technologies to enhance the effects of ultrasound. These explorations would facilitate the large-scale application of ultrasound in the preservation of fresh fruits and vegetables.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; cherry tomato; postharvest ripening; spoilage microorganism; ultrasound
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26375026 DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.12955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Sci ISSN: 0022-1147 Impact factor: 3.167