Literature DB >> 26374816

Antibody responses after primary immunization in infants born to women receiving a pertussis-containing vaccine during pregnancy: single arm observational study with a historical comparator.

Shamez N Ladhani1, Nick J Andrews2, Jo Southern3, Christine E Jones4, Gayatri Amirthalingam3, Pauline A Waight3, Anna England5, Mary Matheson5, Xilian Bai6, Helen Findlow6, Polly Burbidge7, Vasili Thalasselis7, Bassam Hallis5, David Goldblatt7, Ray Borrow6, Paul T Heath4, Elizabeth Miller3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In England, antenatal pertussis immunization using a tetanus/low-dose diphtheria/5-component acellular-pertussis/inactivated-polio (TdaP5/IPV) vaccine was introduced in October 2012. We assessed infant responses to antigens in the maternal vaccine and to those conjugated to tetanus (TT) or the diphtheria toxin variant, CRM.
METHODS: Infants of 141 TdaP5/IPV-vaccinated mothers in Southern England immunized with DTaP5/IPV/Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib-TT) vaccine at 2-3-4 months, 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13, CRM-conjugated) at 2-4 months and 1 or 2 meningococcal C vaccine (MCC-CRM- or MCC-TT) doses at 3-4 months had blood samples taken at 2 and/or 5 months of age.
RESULTS: Antibody responses to pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), fimbriae 2 + 3 (FIMs), diphtheria, tetanus, Hib, MCC and PCV13 serotypes were compared to responses in a historical cohort of 246 infants born to mothers not vaccinated in pregnancy. Infants had high pertussis antibody concentrations pre-immunization but only PT antibodies increased post-immunization (fold-change, 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.12-3.30; P < .001), whereas FHA antibodies fell (fold-change, 0.56; 95% CI, .48-.65; P < .001). Compared with infants of unvaccinated mothers, PT, FHA, and FIMs antibodies were lower post-vaccination, with fold-differences of 0.67 (0.58-0.77; P < .001), 0.62 (0.54-0.71; P < .001) and 0.51 (0.42-0.62; P < .001), respectively. Antibodies to diphtheria and some CRM-conjugated antigens were also lower, although most infants achieved protective thresholds; antibodies to tetanus and Hib were higher.
CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal pertussis immunization results in high infant pre-immunization antibody concentrations, but blunts subsequent responses to pertussis vaccine and some CRM-conjugated antigens. In countries with no pertussis booster until school age, continued monitoring of protection against pertussis is essential.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antenatal immunization; conjugate vaccines; immune interference; maternal vaccination; pertussis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26374816     DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  48 in total

1.  One size fits all? Antibody avidity measurement against multiple antigens in maternal vaccination studies.

Authors:  Thomas Rice; Beate Kampmann; Beth Holder
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 2.  Immune persistence after pertussis vaccination.

Authors:  Zhiyun Chen; Qiushui He
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The Influence of Maternally Derived Antibody and Infant Age at Vaccination on Infant Vaccine Responses : An Individual Participant Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Merryn Voysey; Dominic F Kelly; Thomas R Fanshawe; Manish Sadarangani; Katherine L O'Brien; Rafael Perera; Andrew J Pollard
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Influence of maternal vaccination against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis on the avidity of infant antibody responses to a pertussis containing vaccine in Belgium.

Authors:  Raïssa Nadège Caboré; Kirsten Maertens; Alexandre Dobly; Elke Leuridan; Pierre Van Damme; Kris Huygen
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of pertussis vaccination for pregnant women - a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Marie Furuta; Jacqueline Sin; Edmond S W Ng; Kay Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

Authors:  Jennifer L Liang; Tejpratap Tiwari; Pedro Moro; Nancy E Messonnier; Arthur Reingold; Mark Sawyer; Thomas A Clark
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2018-04-27

Review 7.  Immunization During Pregnancy: Impact on the Infant.

Authors:  Kirsten P Perrett; Terry M Nolan
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 8.  Recommended immunization schedules for adults: Clinical practice guidelines by the Escmid Vaccine Study Group (EVASG), European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) and the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid).

Authors:  Susanna Esposito; Paolo Bonanni; Stefania Maggi; Litjan Tan; Filippo Ansaldi; Pier Luigi Lopalco; Ron Dagan; Jean-Pierre Michel; Pierre van Damme; Jacques Gaillat; Roman Prymula; Timo Vesikari; Cristina Mussini; Uwe Frank; Albert Osterhaus; Lucia Pastore Celentano; Marta Rossi; Valentina Guercio; Gaetan Gavazzi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Respiratory syncytial virus seasonality and its implications on prevention strategies.

Authors:  Sophie Janet; Jonathan Broad; Matthew D Snape
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Association Between Third-Trimester Tdap Immunization and Neonatal Pertussis Antibody Concentration.

Authors:  C Mary Healy; Marcia A Rench; Laurie S Swaim; E O'Brian Smith; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Marsenia H Mathis; Monte D Martin; Carol J Baker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.