Jerome Sarris1,2, Georgina Oliver3, David A Camfield4,5,6, Olivia M Dean7,8, Nathan Dowling3, Deidre J Smith3, Jenifer Murphy3, Ranjit Menon3, Michael Berk7,9,8, Scott Blair-West3, Chee H Ng3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic, The University of Melbourne, 2 Salisbury St, Richmond, Melbourne, VIC, 3121, Australia. jsarris@unimelb.edu.au. 2. Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. jsarris@unimelb.edu.au. 3. Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic, The University of Melbourne, 2 Salisbury St, Richmond, Melbourne, VIC, 3121, Australia. 4. Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 5. Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. 6. School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. 7. IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia. 8. Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 9. Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling mental illness for which pharmacological and psychosocial interventions are all too often inadequate. Recent preclinical and clinical studies have implicated dysfunction of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the pathophysiology of OCD. The amino acid-based nutraceutical N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) is a safe and readily available agent that has been found to modify the synaptic release of glutamate in subcortical brain regions via modulation of the cysteine-glutamate antiporter. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of NAC in treating OCD. METHODS: A 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial using 3 g/day of NAC (1.5 g twice daily) in 44 participants (aged 18-70 years) with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5)-diagnosed OCD, during 2013-2015. The primary outcome measure was the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), conducted every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Analysis of the full sample (intention-to-treat) with repeated measures mixed linear modelling revealed a nonsignificant time × treatment interaction for the YBOCS scale total score (p = 0.39). A per-protocol analysis removing protocol violators also failed to show a significant time × treatment interaction for YBOCS total score (p = 0.15). However, a significant time × treatment interaction was observed for the YBOCS 'Compulsions' subscale in favour of NAC (p = 0.013), with a significant reduction observed at week 12 (dissipating at week 16). At 16 weeks, only four (20%) participants were considered 'responders' (YBOCS ≥35% reduction at endpoint) versus four (27%) in the placebo group. The NAC was well-tolerated, aside from more cases of heartburn occurring compared with placebo (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Further research involving NAC for OCD may require larger samples to detect moderate or small effect sizes, involve dosage or formulation differences, use in concert with exposure therapy, or an additional post-study observational period to mitigate study withdrawal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12613000310763.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling mental illness for which pharmacological and psychosocial interventions are all too often inadequate. Recent preclinical and clinical studies have implicated dysfunction of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the pathophysiology of OCD. The amino acid-based nutraceutical N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) is a safe and readily available agent that has been found to modify the synaptic release of glutamate in subcortical brain regions via modulation of the cysteine-glutamate antiporter. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of NAC in treating OCD. METHODS: A 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial using 3 g/day of NAC (1.5 g twice daily) in 44 participants (aged 18-70 years) with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5)-diagnosed OCD, during 2013-2015. The primary outcome measure was the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), conducted every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Analysis of the full sample (intention-to-treat) with repeated measures mixed linear modelling revealed a nonsignificant time × treatment interaction for the YBOCS scale total score (p = 0.39). A per-protocol analysis removing protocol violators also failed to show a significant time × treatment interaction for YBOCS total score (p = 0.15). However, a significant time × treatment interaction was observed for the YBOCS 'Compulsions' subscale in favour of NAC (p = 0.013), with a significant reduction observed at week 12 (dissipating at week 16). At 16 weeks, only four (20%) participants were considered 'responders' (YBOCS ≥35% reduction at endpoint) versus four (27%) in the placebo group. The NAC was well-tolerated, aside from more cases of heartburn occurring compared with placebo (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Further research involving NAC for OCD may require larger samples to detect moderate or small effect sizes, involve dosage or formulation differences, use in concert with exposure therapy, or an additional post-study observational period to mitigate study withdrawal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12613000310763.
Authors: Kwok Ho Christopher Choy; Olivia Dean; Michael Berk; Ashley I Bush; Maarten van den Buuse Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Ben J Harrison; Jesus Pujol; Narcis Cardoner; Joan Deus; Pino Alonso; Marina López-Solà; Oren Contreras-Rodríguez; Eva Real; Cinto Segalàs; Laura Blanco-Hinojo; José M Menchon; Carles Soriano-Mas Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Murat Yücel; Stephen J Wood; R Mark Wellard; Ben J Harrison; Alex Fornito; Jesus Pujol; Dennis Velakoulis; Christos Pantelis Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: W K Goodman; L H Price; S A Rasmussen; C Mazure; R L Fleischmann; C L Hill; G R Heninger; D S Charney Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1989-11
Authors: Isaac D Zike; Muhammad O Chohan; Jared M Kopelman; Emily N Krasnow; Daniel Flicker; Katherine M Nautiyal; Michael Bubser; Christoph Kellendonk; Carrie K Jones; Gregg Stanwood; Kenji Fransis Tanaka; Holly Moore; Susanne E Ahmari; Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dan J Stein; Daniel L C Costa; Christine Lochner; Euripedes C Miguel; Y C Janardhan Reddy; Roseli G Shavitt; Odile A van den Heuvel; H Blair Simpson Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Christopher Pittenger; Brian P Brennan; Lorrin Koran; Carol A Mathews; Gerald Nestadt; Michele Pato; Katharine A Phillips; Carolyn I Rodriguez; H Blair Simpson; Petros Skapinakis; Dan J Stein; Eric A Storch Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 11.225
Authors: Naomi A Fineberg; Annemieke M Apergis-Schoute; Matilde M Vaghi; Paula Banca; Claire M Gillan; Valerie Voon; Samuel R Chamberlain; Eduardo Cinosi; Jemma Reid; Sonia Shahper; Edward T Bullmore; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.176