Literature DB >> 26374684

The Food and Drug Administration and pragmatic clinical trials of marketed medical products.

Monique L Anderson1, Joseph Griffin2, Sara F Goldkind3, Emily P Zeitler4, Liz Wing5, Sana M Al-Khatib4, Rachel E Sherman2.   

Abstract

Pragmatic clinical trials can help answer questions of comparative effectiveness for interventions routinely used in medical practice. Pragmatic clinical trials may examine outcomes of one or more marketed medical products, and they are heterogeneous in design and risk. The Food and Drug Administration is charged with protecting the rights, safety, and welfare of individuals enrolled in clinical investigations, as well as assuring the integrity of the data upon which approval of medical products is made. The Food and Drug Administration has broad jurisdiction over drugs and medical devices (whether or not they are approved for marketing), and as such, clinical investigations of these products are subject to applicable Food and Drug Administration regulations. While many pragmatic clinical trials will meet the criteria for an exemption from the requirements for an investigational new drug application or investigational device exemption, in general, all clinical investigations of medical products that fall under Food and Drug Administration jurisdiction must adhere to regulations for informed consent and review by an institutional review board. We are concerned that current Food and Drug Administration requirements for obtaining individual informed consent may deter or delay the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials intended to develop reliable evidence of comparative safety and effectiveness of approved medical products that are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. Under current regulations, there are no described mechanisms to alter or waive informed consent to make it less burdensome or more practicable for low-risk pragmatic clinical trials. We recommend that the Food and Drug Administration establish a risk-based approach to obtaining informed consent in pragmatic clinical trials that would facilitate the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials without compromising the protection of enrolled individuals or the integrity of the resulting data.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research oversight; Food and Drug Administration; informed consent; medical devices; pragmatic clinical trials; regulations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26374684      PMCID: PMC4592418          DOI: 10.1177/1740774515597700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  25 in total

1.  Effect of intravenous lidocaine on manifestations of fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Roberto Vlainich; Adriana M Issy; Luis R Gerola; Rioko K Sakata
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Hugh Macpherson
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2004 Jun-Sep       Impact factor: 2.446

3.  Combination of isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine in blacks with heart failure.

Authors:  Anne L Taylor; Susan Ziesche; Clyde Yancy; Peter Carson; Ralph D'Agostino; Keith Ferdinand; Malcolm Taylor; Kirkwood Adams; Michael Sabolinski; Manuel Worcel; Jay N Cohn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Patrick T O'Gara; Frederick G Kushner; Deborah D Ascheim; Donald E Casey; Mina K Chung; James A de Lemos; Steven M Ettinger; James C Fang; Francis M Fesmire; Barry A Franklin; Christopher B Granger; Harlan M Krumholz; Jane A Linderbaum; David A Morrow; L Kristin Newby; Joseph P Ornato; Narith Ou; Martha J Radford; Jacqueline E Tamis-Holland; Carl L Tommaso; Cynthia M Tracy; Y Joseph Woo; David X Zhao; Jeffrey L Anderson; Alice K Jacobs; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Ralph G Brindis; Mark A Creager; David DeMets; Robert A Guyton; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; Frederick G Kushner; E Magnus Ohman; William G Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Effect of intravenous lidocaine associated with amitriptyline on pain relief and plasma serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine concentrations in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Roberto Vlainich; Adriana Machado Issy; Rioko Kimiko Sakata
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Jeffrey W Moses; Stephen G Ellis; Joachim Schofer; Keith D Dawkins; Marie-Claude Morice; Antonio Colombo; Erick Schampaert; Eberhard Grube; Ajay J Kirtane; Donald E Cutlip; Martin Fahy; Stuart J Pocock; Roxana Mehran; Martin B Leon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Alexandra J Lansky; Stuart J Pocock; Bernard J Gersh; George Dangas; S Chiu Wong; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Giulio Guagliumi; Jan Z Peruga; Bruce R Brodie; Dariusz Dudek; Martin Möckel; Andrzej Ochala; Alison Kellock; Helen Parise; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Intravenous lidocaine for fibromyalgia syndrome: an open trial.

Authors:  Marcelo Derbli Schafranski; Tiago Malucelli; Fabíola Machado; Hélcio Takeshi; Flávia Kaiber; Carolina Schmidt; Fabielle Harth
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 9.  EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia syndrome.

Authors:  S F Carville; L Arendt-Nielsen; S Arendt-Nielsen; H Bliddal; F Blotman; J C Branco; D Buskila; J A P Da Silva; B Danneskiold-Samsøe; F Dincer; C Henriksson; K G Henriksson; E Kosek; K Longley; G M McCarthy; S Perrot; M Puszczewicz; P Sarzi-Puttini; A Silman; M Späth; E H Choy
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 10.  A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Patsopoulos
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 5.986

View more
  10 in total

1.  Harms, benefits, and the nature of interventions in pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Joseph Ali; Joseph E Andrews; Carol P Somkin; C Egla Rabinovich
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Exploring the ethical and regulatory issues in pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert M Califf; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Practical steps to identifying the research risk of pragmatic trials.

Authors:  Scott Yh Kim; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.599

4.  Informed consent in pragmatic trials: results from a survey of trials published 2014-2019.

Authors:  Jennifer Zhe Zhang; Stuart G Nicholls; Kelly Carroll; Hayden Peter Nix; Cory E Goldstein; Spencer Phillips Hey; Jamie C Brehaut; Paul C McLean; Charles Weijer; Dean A Fergusson; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.926

5.  Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; David Wendler; Chandan M Devireddy; Sara F Goldkind; Yi-An Ko; Candace D Speight; Scott Yh Kim
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  A comparison of institutional review board professionals' and patients' views on consent for research on medical practices.

Authors:  Stephanie Alessi Kraft; Mildred K Cho; Melissa Constantine; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Maureen Kelley; Diane Korngiebel; Cyan James; Ellen Kuwana; Adrienne Meyer; Kathryn Porter; Douglas Diekema; Alexander M Capron; Radica Alicic; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Magnus
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Adrian F Hernandez; Gloria D Coronado; Lynn L DeBar; Laura M Dember; Beverly B Green; Patrick J Heagerty; Susan S Huang; Kathryn T James; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Vincent Mor; Richard Platt; Gary E Rosenthal; Edward J Septimus; Gregory E Simon; Karen L Staman; Jeremy Sugarman; Miguel Vazquez; Douglas Zatzick; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Comparing Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Studies in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Donald P Tashkin; Alpesh N Amin; Edward M Kerwin
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2020-06-02

9.  Justice and equity in pragmatic clinical trials: Considerations for pain research within integrated health systems.

Authors:  Joseph Ali; Alison F Davis; Diana J Burgess; Daniel I Rhon; Robert Vining; Stacey Young-McCaughan; Sean Green; Robert D Kerns
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2021-10-19

10.  Advancing a Framework for Regulatory Use of Real-World Evidence: When Real Is Reliable.

Authors:  Nancy A Dreyer
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.778

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.