Literature DB >> 26374372

Clinical Evaluation of Proximal Contact Points in Fixed Prostheses.

Qayyum Akhtar1, Sadia Danyal2, Shazia Zareen3, Bilal Ahmed2, Muzamil Maqsood2, Azad Ali Azad2.   

Abstract

This cross-sectional study clinically assesses the tightness of proximal contact points of fixed dental prosthesis with natural teeth. Sixty nine (69) patients visiting the Department of Prosthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentists (AFID), Rawalpindi, were included. The crowns, as a single unit or terminal abutment of bridge, prepared and fabricated at the same institute were included. A total of 142 Proximal Contact Points (PCPs) were assessed with the dental floss and categorized as acceptable, loose and tight. Among these, 83 (58.4%) were acceptable, 41 (28.8%) loose and 18 (12.6%) were tight. Out of 142 PCPs, 104 (73.2%) were Porcelain Fused to Metal (PFM) and 38 (26.7%), all metal. Out of 104 PFM crown/FPD PCPs 59 (56.7%) were acceptable, 32 (30.7%) were loose and 13 (12.5%) tight. Out of 38 all metal crown/FPD PCPs 24 (63%) acceptable, 9 (23%) were loose and 5 (13%) were tight. PCPs must be checked for acceptability before cementation. The PCPs of adjacent natural dentition in same patient may serve as guide for assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26374372     DOI: 09.2015/JCPSP.702704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak        ISSN: 1022-386X            Impact factor:   0.711


  3 in total

1.  Remake Rates for Single-Unit Crowns in Clinical Practice: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Mark S Litaker; Valeria V Gordan; Thomas Karr; Ellen Sowell; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Evaluation of presence of proximal contacts on recently inserted posterior crowns in different health sectors in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ahmad D Almalki; Mohammad A Al-Rafee
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-11-15

3.  Operators' Ease and Satisfaction in Restoring Class II Cavities With Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix System at Qassim University Dental Clinics.

Authors:  Mohammed Almushayti; Bilal Arjumand
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.