Literature DB >> 26373988

Exploring the influential factors in incident clearance time: Disentangling causation from self-selection bias.

Chuan Ding1, Xiaolei Ma2, Yinhai Wang3, Yunpeng Wang4.   

Abstract

Understanding the relationships between influential factors and incident clearance time is crucial to make effective countermeasures for incident management agencies. Although there have been a certain number of achievements on incident clearance time modeling, limited effort is made to investigate the relative role of incident response time and its self-selection in influencing the clearance time. To fill this gap, this study uses the endogenous switching model to explore the influential factors in incident clearance time, and aims to disentangle causation from self-selection bias caused by response process. Under the joint two-stage model framework, the binary probit model and switching regression model are formulated for both incident response time and clearance time, respectively. Based on the freeway incident data collected in Washington State, full information maximum likelihood (FIML) method is utilized to estimate the endogenous switching model parameters. Significant factors affecting incident response time and clearance time can be identified, including incident, temporal, geographical, environmental, traffic and operational attributes. The estimate results reveal the influential effects of incident, temporal, geographical, environmental, traffic and operational factors on incident response time and clearance time. In addition, the causality of incident response time itself and its self-selection correction on incident clearance time are found to be indispensable. These findings suggest that the causal effect of response time on incident clearance time will be overestimated if the self-selection bias is not considered.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Clearance time; Freeway incident; Response time; Self-selection bias; Treatment effect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26373988     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  6 in total

1.  Comparing and Contrasting the Impacts of Macro-Level Factors on Crash Duration and Frequency.

Authors:  Sai Chand; Zhuolin Li; Abdulmajeed Alsultan; Vinayak V Dixit
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  A Heckman selection model for the safety analysis of signalized intersections.

Authors:  Xuecai Xu; S C Wong; Feng Zhu; Xin Pei; Helai Huang; Youjun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Driving anger and its relationships with type A behavior patterns and trait anger: Differences between professional and non-professional drivers.

Authors:  Zhongxiang Feng; Miaomiao Yang; Changxi Ma; Kang Jiang; Yewei Lei; Wenjuan Huang; Zhipeng Huang; Jingjing Zhan; Muxiong Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Driving style recognition method using braking characteristics based on hidden Markov model.

Authors:  Chao Deng; Chaozhong Wu; Nengchao Lyu; Zhen Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Will higher traffic flow lead to more traffic conflicts? A crash surrogate metric based analysis.

Authors:  Yan Kuang; Xiaobo Qu; Yadan Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of elderly population's traffic accidents in Seoul using space-time cube and space-time kernel density estimation.

Authors:  Youngok Kang; Nahye Cho; Serin Son
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.