Literature DB >> 26373567

A Call for Evidence-based Decision Making When Selecting Outcome Measurement Instruments for Summary of Findings Tables in Systematic Reviews: Results from an OMERACT Working Group.

Dorcas E Beaton1,2, Caroline B Terwee3,4, Jasvinder A Singh3,4, Gillian A Hawker3,4, Donald L Patrick3,4, Laurie B Burke3,4, Karine Toupin-April3,4, Peter S Tugwell3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Systematic reviews often struggle with how to combine information when more than 1 instrument is used across studies being synthesized. Different techniques have been suggested based on frequency of use in the literature, or on consensus. We explore an approach blending 2 initiatives: OMERACT (Outcome Measurement in Rheumatology) and COSMIN (Consensus On Selection of Measurement Instruments), and investigate the effects of an evidence-based measurement approach on selection of outcomes.
METHODS: Readings were circulated to attendees registered for a preconference workshop on pain measurement. Three instruments were considered and exercises conducted to engage people in the content and measurement performance of these tools. Consensus was sought that an evidence-based approach could be created for selection of instruments for summary of findings (SoF) tables.
RESULTS: The blending of COSMIN and OMERACT approaches led to an evidence-based approach that depended both on a clear definition of target concept and a review of measurement performance of the instrument. Participants emphasized that conceptual clarity and practical considerations should come before measurement property results.
CONCLUSION: Evidence-based approaches can be adopted for selection of instruments for SoF tables. A research agenda was formulated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EVIDENCE BASED; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; OUTCOME MEASUREMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

Year:  2015        PMID: 26373567     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  5 in total

1.  Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences for 4 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety in Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Augustine C Lee; Jeffrey B Driban; Lori Lyn Price; William F Harvey; Angie Mae Rodday; Chenchen Wang
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 2.  Patient reported outcome measures in neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Roderick Clark; Blayne Welk
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-02

3.  Cross-cultural survey development: The Colon Cancer Screening Behaviors Survey for South Asian populations.

Authors:  Joanne Crawford; Dorcas Beaton; Farah Ahmad; Arlene S Bierman
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-12-28

4.  Evaluation of the psychometric properties of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a COSMIN systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Philippe Bérubé-Mercier; Diane Tapp; Marie-Ève Cimon; Tiffany Li; Susanna B Park; Éve Bouhêlier; Kaitlin McGarragle; Lye-Ann Robichaud; Jennifer S Gewandter; Maxime Bouchard; Lynn R Gauthier
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Updating the Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Core Domain Set: A Report from the PsA Workshop at OMERACT 2016.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Orbai; Maarten de Wit; Philip J Mease; Kristina Callis Duffin; Musaab Elmamoun; William Tillett; Willemina Campbell; Oliver FitzGerald; Dafna D Gladman; Niti Goel; Laure Gossec; Pil Hoejgaard; Ying Ying Leung; Chris Lindsay; Vibeke Strand; Désirée M van der Heijde; Bev Shea; Robin Christensen; Laura Coates; Lihi Eder; Neil McHugh; Umut Kalyoncu; Ingrid Steinkoenig; Alexis Ogdie
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.666

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.